I am calculating the forces on String cheese with net force = 0

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around calculating forces acting on a piece of string cheese, specifically focusing on the forces F1 and F2 while noting that the net force is zero. Participants clarify that the cheese is at rest, meaning all forces acting on it must balance out, and they emphasize the importance of decomposing F1 into its vertical and horizontal components. There is debate over the existence of an additional force, F3, which some argue should be ignored since the cheese is not on a horizontal surface and lacks an upward normal force. The conversation also touches on the implications of switching frames of reference in Newtonian physics, particularly regarding acceleration. The cheese in question is identified as Gouda, adding a light-hearted element to the technical discussion.
rgtr
Messages
90
Reaction score
8
Homework Statement
Example 2: String cheese A wedge of cheese is suspended at rest by two strings which exert forces of magnitude F1 and f2 as seen below. There is also a downward force of gravity on the cheese of magnitude 20 N What is the magnitude of the force F1? What is the magnitude of the force F2?
Relevant Equations
## f = ma ##
Physics news on Phys.org
rgtr said:
Shouldn't ay be ax?
Why? The 20N is a vertical force, and ##F_1\sin(60°)## is the vertical component of ##F_1##.
 
Are you saying o or F1Y = 20N? I don't understand why. Can someone explain?
 
rgtr said:
Are you saying o or F1Y = 20N? I don't understand why. Can someone explain?
What is the net vertical force on the wedge?
 
Sorry I used a old account to originally respond. The answer is the net force is 0.
 
rgtr said:
Sorry I used a old account to originally respond. The answer is the net force is 0.
Yes, but what vertical forces on it sum to that?
 
rgtr said:
Are you saying o or F1Y = 20N? I don't understand why. Can someone explain?

wqi4ed_processed.png
That wedge of cheese is hanging at rest, according to the problem.
Therefore, forces in all directions cancel each other.
If you define axes x and y as to be aligned with F2 and F4, then you need to decompose F1 in its projections on each of those axes: F1x and F1y.

You should remove that F3 from your schematic, since it does not exist.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2
How can you ignore F3? It can range from 0-20N depending on F1Y. F1Y can also range from 0-20N depending on F3.
 
rgtr said:
How can you ignore F3? It can range from 0-20N depending on F1Y. F1Y can also range from 0-20N depending on F3.
The cheese is not resting on a horizontal surface so there is no upwards normal reaction force (unlike a piece of cheese on a table foe example).

There is no vertical string, so there is no upwards pull from the tension a vertical string.

So there is no upwards force, F3, acting on the piece of cheese. F3 should be removed.

There are 3 forces on the cheese:
F1 - the pull (tension) of the right-hand string on the cheese, at 60º to the horizontal;
F2 - the pull (tension) of the left-hand string – horizontally to the left;
20N - the weight of the cheese (the downwards pull of gravity)

If you think there is another force, F3, what is producing this force?

Also, what type of cheese is it?
 
  • Like
Likes rgtr and Lnewqban
  • #10
Thanks I get it now.
The cheese is Gouda.

Also in Newtonian physics when switching frames does acceleration switch like constant velocity?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Steve4Physics
  • #11
When I saw the title of this thread, I thought, "gee, I don't remember ever seeing a physics problem about string cheese."
 
  • #12
rgtr said:
... Also in Newtonian physics when switching frames does acceleration switch like constant velocity?
Could you mention an example of switching frames?
 
  • #13
Imagine I have a stationary person called A. And a person who running at an accelerating rate called B.
If I switch to B's frame does A accelerate the same amount as B in A's frame just the opposite direction?

Sorry this is a little wordy.
 
  • Like
Likes Lnewqban
  • #14
rgtr said:
Imagine I have a stationary person called A. And a person who running at an accelerating rate called B.
If I switch to B's frame does A accelerate the same amount as B in A's frame just the opposite direction?

Sorry this is a little wordy.
Yes.
 
Back
Top