Once it is ASCII there is no way to recover it. I had a couple of attempts.renormalize said:
Undo (if you're using the rich text editor or a laptop or something where ctrl-z will work) used to work to recover your original LaTeX when this bug was around before. Probably not once you've left the page, though.fresh_42 said:
Yes. The "refresh" command is the critical point. This is therefore problematic since it has to be used if the "preview" option doesn't render LaTeX.Ibix said:
I still have this problem. No "preview", "refresh", backward nor forward helps. If I submit the reply and refresh, I can see the LaTeX, but then I send some premature notifications to some innocent honest members. If I go back to editing, LaTeX disappears again.renormalize said:
I installed FireFox 113.0.2 in hope to overcome the rendering issue. Now it is even worse. Preview mode only works on rare occasions, and when it does, exiting preview mode ruins all LaTeX.JimWhoKnew said:
Still working on a fix. Hoping for next week.JimWhoKnew said:
Thanks for everything. Much appreciatedGreg Bernhardt said:
It shouldn't be broken in the first place.Greg Bernhardt said:
Adapted. One of the great advantages of using AutoHotKey.Greg Bernhardt said:
Not sure if this is related, but the editor box is extremely laggy for me since this announcement. I'm frequently typing two words ahead of the text in the box. It might just be my phone being rubbish, but thought I'd comment in case others are experiencing this.Greg Bernhardt said:
It does not really work. The codeGreg Bernhardt said:
[tex]
\left( \sum_{n=1}^\infty a_n \right) \cdot \left( \sum_{m=1}^\infty b_m \right)= \sum_{k=2}^\infty \sum_{n+m=k}a_nb_m= \sum_{n=1}^\infty \sum_{m=1}^\infty a_nb_m
[/tex]
by the distributive law. The real question is why you can swap the infinite summation with the integral.yeah it's rendering the returns. keep the tag on the same line as the start of the latexfresh_42 said:
The color trick to prevent code from rendering also isn't working anymore. It seems to strip the color tags.Greg Bernhardt said:
https://math.stackexchange.com/Greg Bernhardt said:
You can type LaTeX code in their MathJax version, and it renders as a LaTeX editor would, including dollar instead of double sharp and double dollar as usual. The preview is below the edit window, and it updates immediately. I don't like the forum for several reasons, but their editor is nice.Greg Bernhardt said:
Greg Bernhardt said:
\begin{align*}
\ldots & \ldots \\
\end{align*}Okay, that's really weird. When I first posted it the double-delimiter things did not work and the [ tex ] tags did. Now it's the opposite when I re-check my post. I'm guessing it's being worked on in the background...berkeman said:
It goes without saying that we shouldn't have to do this. This has been two months now.fresh_42 said:
I have a couple of freelance Xenforo devs working on this and struggling with the new editor. Xenforo 2.4 (out in a few months) will switch to yet another editor. Maybe that is a good thing. @PeroK I would love your support as a programmer. Please DM me and it would be great for you to have a look. Thanks!!PeroK said:
Update: @Greg Bernhardt promptly fixed the issue. All my messages now properly render their LaTeX content.renormalize said:
One other possible workaround is to keep a dummy insight around. Latex preview in Wordpress works just fine. When done, cut and paste to your reply.PeroK said:
Yeah, but it has another big disadvantage: Do not do this with an existing WP text!PAllen said:
Can you clarify? I see you would never want to use a posted insight; that's why I suggested a dummy (draft) insight. Once the latex issue is solved, get rid of the dummy draft. Do you see any problems with that?fresh_42 said:
No. I just wanted to point out that the update function on WP has a very negative impact on the corresponding thread on PF. A dummy thread is ok. You just shouldn't use an existing one.PAllen said:
Is it already live, since as of now, it does not work on CW for me?Greg Bernhardt said:
Yeah it's live on CW and works for me. Clear your cache.fresh_42 said:
Well, yes and no.Greg Bernhardt said:
##
\begin{pmatrix}a&b\end{pmatrix}
##
[itex]
\begin{pmatrix}c&d\end{pmatrix}
[/itex]
$$
\begin{pmatrix}e&f\end{pmatrix}
$$
[tex]
\begin{pmatrix}g&h\end{pmatrix}
[/tex]## \begin{pmatrix}a&b\end{pmatrix} ...
(ab)I removed that as all dev is on here nowfresh_42 said:
can you elaborate on this in simple termsfresh_42 said:
are you suggesting some config has changed?fresh_42 said:
Works now.Greg Bernhardt said:
##\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}##
[itex]\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}[/itex]
$$\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}$$
[tex]\begin{pmatrix}1&0\\0&1\end{pmatrix}[/tex]##<br>\begin{pmatrix}a&b\end{pmatrix}<br>##<br><br>[itex]<br>\begin{pmatrix}c&d\end{pmatrix}<br>[/itex]<br><br>$$<br>\begin{pmatrix}e&f\end{pmatrix}<br>$$<br><br>[tex]<br>\begin{pmatrix}g&h\end{pmatrix}<br>[/tex]Not anymore. I had testedGreg Bernhardt said:
\begin{align*}
1&=-1\\[16pt]
0&\neq 1
\end{align*}This was directly after I posted it correct, but now it looks broken. Strange.fresh_42 said:
