I hope that helps! Proof of Definite Integral??

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion clarifies the connection between Riemann sums and definite integrals, specifically how the definite integral \(\int^{b}_{a}f(x)dx\) equals \(F(b) - F(a)\). This relationship arises because \(F(b)\) represents the area from 0 to \(b\) and \(F(a)\) from 0 to \(a\), allowing the subtraction to yield the area between \(a\) and \(b\). Additionally, it is established that the function \(f(x)\) must be Riemann-integrable, meaning it must be analytically differentiable and continuous across the interval from \(a\) to \(b\) for this proof to hold.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Riemann sums
  • Knowledge of definite integrals
  • Familiarity with the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus
  • Concept of Riemann-integrable functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail
  • Learn about Riemann-integrable functions and their properties
  • Explore different integration techniques for non-continuous functions
  • Investigate applications of integration in modeling stochastic processes like Brownian motion
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone seeking to deepen their understanding of the relationship between Riemann sums and definite integrals.

Calculuser
Messages
49
Reaction score
3
Proof of Definite Integral??

Riemann Sum helps us to find the are under a curve.But I couldn't understand connection between Riemann Sum and Definite Integral.I mean;

[itex]\int^{b}_{a}f(x).dx=F(b)-F(a)[/itex] How can I prove F(b)-F(a) in definite integral??

Thanks..
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org


Well, the connection between the two is that the definite integral is essentially using an infinite amount of Riemann sums to calculate the area under a curve. Integration allows for the area to be calculated without having to add up the area of each Riemann sum manually.

Now, [itex]\int^{b}_{a}f(x)dx[/itex] is equal to [itex]F(b)-F(a)[/itex] because [itex]F(b)[/itex] calculates the area from 0 to b, [itex]F(a)[/itex] calculates the are from 0 to a. Subtracting these two values will cut the area [itex]F(a)[/itex] calculated from [itex]F(b)[/itex] leaving just the area from a to b.

I hope I was able to provide the information that you needed for you to finish your proof.
 


Calculuser said:
Riemann Sum helps us to find the are under a curve.But I couldn't understand connection between Riemann Sum and Definite Integral.I mean;

[itex]\int^{b}_{a}f(x).dx=F(b)-F(a)[/itex] How can I prove F(b)-F(a) in definite integral??

Thanks..

Hey Calculuser and welcome to the forums.

You actually can't do this for any f(x): it needs to what is called "Riemann-Integrable" for this to happen.

There are strict conditions that can be representing through formal mathematical statements but the basic idea is that your anti-derivative must be analytically differentiable and continuous everywhere across the domain (i.e. from a to b).

If this is not the case, then you have to either separate your intervals into ones where this happens or use a different integration technique (like for when you are modelling things like Brownian motion).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
5K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K