I know everything to do on this problem except one thing

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on a problem involving the calculation of distances rA, rB, rA', and rB' using energy conservation principles. The participant has formulas for potential and kinetic energy but struggles to express the required distances. Suggestions include starting with a clear strategy and providing justification for the chosen formulas. A recommendation is made to use the distance formula and to clarify what the r variables represent. The importance of diagrams and clear communication of variables is emphasized to facilitate assistance.
flamebane
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
Homework Statement
Two charged particles A (qA = 2.86 𝜇C) and B (qB = 1.47 𝜇C) are fixed in place along the x-axis at 𝑥 = ±3.38 cm, respectively. If a third charged particle C (qC = 3.92 𝜇C and mass mC = 10.21 mg) is released from rest on the y-axis at y = 2.57 cm, what will the speed of particle C be when it reaches 𝑦 = 4.43 cm? Answer in m/s
Relevant Equations
principle of conservation of energy
KE
Even though I have all the formulas needed to do this problem, I cant figure out how to get rA, rB and rA' aswell as rB'
 
Physics news on Phys.org
flamebane said:
Even though I have all the formulas needed to do this problem, I cant figure out how to get rA, rB and rA' aswell as rB'
You could start by showing us the formulas that you plan to use. But perhaps we need to back up a step. Can you explain your strategy? What formulas are justified by the physical situation? Please provide that justification.

Then you would be in a position to explain what ##r_A##, ##r_B##, ##r_A'## and ##r_B'## are.

[And we might be in a position to recommend the Pythagorean theorem]
 
jbriggs444 said:
You could start by showing us the formulas that you plan to use. But perhaps we need to back up a step. Can you explain your strategy? What formulas are justified by the physical situation? Please provide that justification.
My strategy is to first find all the potential and kinetic energy of particles A and B, then C. then using the principle of conservation of energy to find V.
 
flamebane said:
My strategy is to first find all the potential and kinetic energy of particles A and B, then C. then using the principle of conservation of energy to find V.
I know what the r's mean I just dont really know how I'm ment to get it, would I use the distance formula?
 
flamebane said:
My strategy is to first find all the potential and kinetic energy of particles A and B, then C. then using the principle of conservation of energy to find V.
Then start by writing some equations for the potential and kinetic energies. If there are quantities that you don't know how to express, point them out. A diagram should help.
 
  • Like
Likes MatinSAR and jbriggs444
flamebane said:
I know what the r's mean I just dont really know how I'm ment to get it, would I use the distance formula?
You may know what the r's mean. But we do not. Because you have not told us.

I could make a good guess that ##r_A## is the distance from <somewhere> to <somewhere else>. Yes, if so, then the formula for calculating the distance from <somewhere> to <somewhere else> will be important.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Likes berkeman and MatinSAR
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top