I want to build a Betavoltaic Battery

  • Thread starter Thread starter DIYMatt
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Battery Build
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the feasibility of building a betavoltaic battery using radioactive materials, specifically focusing on the use of Americium sources from smoke detectors and phosphors like zinc sulfide or zinc sulfate. Participants explore various aspects of the design, potential materials, safety concerns, and the practicality of the project.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses interest in building a betavoltaic battery using Americium sources and phosphors, questioning the feasibility of the glow producing measurable power.
  • Another participant suggests that zinc sulfide would work with Americium and shares personal experience, but doubts the glow would generate useful power.
  • A different participant raises concerns about the weak nature of Am241 sources and suggests looking for better alternatives, while also questioning regulatory issues.
  • One participant inquires about the behavior of excess power in a betavoltaic cell when not connected, speculating on potential heat generation and the effects of negative potential on beta decay.
  • Several participants voice concerns about the dangers of radioactivity, with some arguing that the risks are overstated, while others emphasize the health hazards associated with collecting significant amounts of radioactive material.
  • A participant humorously suggests using a magnesium fuse in a different approach to achieve the goal of powering a digital watch.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express a mix of agreement and disagreement regarding the safety and practicality of using radioactive materials, as well as the effectiveness of proposed phosphors. There is no consensus on the feasibility of the project or the safety implications of using Americium sources.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention various assumptions about the effectiveness of different phosphors and the regulatory landscape surrounding radioactive materials, but these assumptions remain unresolved.

DIYMatt
I want to build a "Betavoltaic Battery"

A while ago I got a tritium keychain that will glow for 10 years, and since then I've gotten very interested in building a generator based on this. Originally I wanted to build a conventional RTG but apparently it is hard to find radioactive materials that are warm to the touch :/

Anyway I thought this would be the place to come for some input on whether or not this would work. My plan is to use Americium sources from smoke detectors because they are easy to find. Obviously a high-beta source would be better but I don't know where to buy something like Stronium 90. The Americium would be suspended in a vial of water mixed with a readily available phosphor (possibly zinc sulphate?) which would then glow, if the stars lined up. The glowing vile would be surrounded by a small solar panel from eBay, and hopefully produce enough power for a digital watch.

There are three things I'm not sure about: would Americium cause zinc sulphate to glow, would the wavelength of zinc sulphate power a solar cell, and would the gentle glow be enough to produce any measurable power? Also my budget is $50 :)
 
Engineering news on Phys.org


hi,


do you mean zinc suphide? not sulphate?


ok ill answer those three questions,

yes, if you are referring to zinc sulphide, it would work because I've done it myself.
i think so, but I am not sure.
i don't think the glow would generate any useful power and i think it would be barely visible,
i put an am. 241 smoke alarm source next to a sheet of zns (zink sulphide) and i had to sit in a dark room for a while before i could see the glow, i think a budget of $50 is a bit low,
i think a budget of $250 would be better

i really like your idea though, i wish you success in building that :)


thanks :)
 


Am241 smoke detector sources are quite weak -- consider the long half-life, for one. And they're not a very good photon source, which are the only things that matter for you here.

I can think of sources that would work better, but I'm not sure what regulations there are on their use outside of research.

Possibly strontium aluminate would be better than zinc sulfide, but I'm not sure that's within your budget.
 


By the way, what happens to the power excess of a betavoltaic cell when it is not connected? Does it turn into heat?

I can imagine that an electrode gets saturated with negative potential and pushes new electrons back inside to the nucleus. Can strong negative potential prevent beta decay or put it in equilibrium? Perhaps not, since neutrinos are involved.
 


Hasn't it occurred to anyone that radioactivity is quite nasty to have around.
Americium sources are tolerated because they are small, weak and the dangers of fire are more pressing.

If you collect enough to represent appreciable power, you have enough to be a serious health hazard.
 


AJ Bentley said:
Hasn't it occurred to anyone that radioactivity is quite nasty to have around.
Americium sources are tolerated because they are small, weak and the dangers of fire are more pressing.

If you collect enough to represent appreciable power, you have enough to be a serious health hazard.



loooooser! just shield it in lead, simples !
 


Hasn't it occurred to anyone that radioactivity is quite nasty to have around.
The harmfulness of radioactivity is overhyped. Single thunder gives you more X-ray radiation than all radioactive materials people have ever dug.
 


haael said:
The harmfulness of radioactivity is overhyped. Single thunder gives you more X-ray radiation than all radioactive materials people have ever dug.

:rolleyes: You want a Darwin Award? go right ahead.
 


Take aluminum, and Iron oxide, mix by weight 3 parts Alum to 8 parts IO.
  1. insert magnesium fuse
  2. light magnesium fuse
  3. run
  4. go to store
  5. buy a digital watch for $19
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K