Physicists build Graphene Thermodynamic Battery

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
3 replies · 1K views
Redmagic
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I read an article in Science Daily 'Physicists build circuit that generates clean, limitless power from graphene'. Can someone explain how to take this from the physics science experiment to the engineering prototype and implementation stage? Is this technology going to revolutionize the mobile energy field or will the physical limits of atomic thermodynamic energy not produce enough power for simple electronics?

Now if these batteries were hypothetically created and released into the wild, I see a entropy issue here. The claim in the article is that this is limitless energy. The laws of thermodynamics have to be preserved, so the energy is being absorbed from the environment.
If enough energy is absorbed from the environment over a long period of time, will this lead to a heatless world and potential ice age? On the other side of this, will it be potentially beneficial for society to absorb excess energy out of the environment and store it to reduce climate change effects? Are the current amounts discussed in this new technology too small to make any impact on a large scale?

Link is here for the article: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2020/10/201002091029.htm
 
on Phys.org
The article just repeats a press release which has been described elsewhere as "a train wreck". It bears almost no relation to what was actually done. They got " A team of University of Arkansas physicists " right - at least I think so - but it all goes downhill from there.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: russ_watters, Astronuc, DaveE and 2 others
Redmagic said:
Link is here for the article

The article is not a valid reference. In addition to the fact that one should always look for the actual peer-reviewed paper, not some journalist's article about the paper, this particular article, as @Vanadium 50 has already noted, completely misdescribes what the paper actually says. Unfortunately, that's pretty much par for the course for most of these "get the latest breaking news in science" websites.

The preprint of the actual paper is here:

https://arxiv.org/abs/2002.09947