I want to think like a physicist

  • Thread starter Thread starter lou6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Physicist
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the desire to rekindle a passion for physics and improve one's ability to think like a physicist. Participants explore the impact of personal experiences on this ability and suggest resources for relearning foundational concepts in physics and related fields.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses a desire to regain their ability to think like a physicist after experiencing difficulties that diminished their interest in the subject.
  • Another participant suggests that studying specific textbooks may help rekindle this interest, mentioning "Applications of Classical Physics" by Blandford and Thorne and "Mathematical Biology" by J. D. Murray.
  • There is a discussion about the nature of algebra-based physics courses, with one participant clarifying that these courses are designed for life sciences and health majors and do not require calculus.
  • Concerns are raised about the personal challenges faced by the original poster, with inquiries into the nature of these distractions, though specifics remain vague.
  • A participant notes that biology is increasingly quantitative and suggests exploring quantitative thinking within biological contexts as a way to engage with physics concepts.
  • Another participant highlights Murray's expertise in modeling pattern formation, indicating that his textbook could be particularly beneficial for understanding such topics.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to rekindle interest in physics, and multiple viewpoints regarding personal experiences and educational resources are presented.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express uncertainty about the specific personal challenges faced and how they relate to the ability to engage with physics. The discussion also reflects varying interpretations of algebra-based physics courses and their relevance to the original poster's situation.

Who May Find This Useful

Individuals seeking to reconnect with physics after personal setbacks, those interested in the intersection of physics and biology, and learners exploring algebra-based physics courses may find this discussion relevant.

lou6
Messages
30
Reaction score
0
I want to think like a " physicist"

i used to use the scientific methodology in inquiring about things and interpreting actions and interactions, However, stuff happens, and I had "not" so good" a couple of years that reduced the ability to think like a physicist and to love physics to a limit that it becomes second hand. What should I do to get this urge back? Any clues? I am thinking that relearning the basics will help me rediscover my love. What do you think? Help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What "stuff"? (Dare I ask?)

Hi, lou6,

Your allusion to "stuff" which "reduced the ability to think like a physicist" is a bit worrying. I assume you mean something like bad experiences in physics courses. If so, the first thought which comes to mind is to suggest that you set aside time to study two books: the excellent on-line textbook by Blandford and Thorne, Applications of Classical Physics, which you can download at http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2004/ and the textbook by J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, 2nd edition, Springer, 1993.
 
Chris Hillman said:
Hi, lou6,

Your allusion to "stuff" which "reduced the ability to think like a physicist" is a bit worrying. I assume you mean something like bad experiences in physics courses. If so, the first thought which comes to mind is to suggest that you set aside time to study two books: the excellent on-line textbook by Blandford and Thorne, Applications of Classical Physics, which you can download at http://www.pma.caltech.edu/Courses/ph136/yr2004/ and the textbook by J. D. Murray, Mathematical Biology, 2nd edition, Springer, 1993.

I had some problems/distractions when I took two "algebra-based" physics courses last year...
 
Algebra-based physics courses? You mean like, Groebner basis methods? Or universal algebra? Or maybe category theory as per Robert Geroch, Mathematical Physics? Where was this?

Just curious.

By problems/distractions do you mean something like a divorce, or something like a prison sentence for a drug offence, or what?

(If you feel comfortable with answering that in general terms...)
 
Chris Hillman said:
Algebra-based physics courses? You mean like, Groebner basis methods? Or universal algebra? Or maybe category theory as per Robert Geroch, Mathematical Physics? Where was this?

Just curious.

By problems/distractions do you mean something like a divorce, or something like a prison sentence for a drug offence, or what?

(If you feel comfortable with answering that in general terms...)

-Algebra-based Physics courses are the courses given for life sciences/health majors. They are not based on calculus.
- No, I don't want to underestimate the "distractions", but they weren't a divorce or stuff like that. I arrived to a point where I didn't know what I want and didn't know, and was lost. I figured a lot of things out since then. Hope that clears things out.
 
Biology is becoming a much more quantitative disciple. There are now a lot of ways to develop quantitative thinking skills without leaving biology. You could try learning about physical/mathematical interpretations of an area of biology that interests you. If you let us know what area of biology you are in, we could probably point you to some relevant quantitative areas...
 
For example, Murray is an expert on modeling pattern formation, so his textbook is very good for that.
 

Similar threads

Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
10K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
6K