Ideal demonstration of time dilation

In summary: The difference in clock readings is because the muon has traveled a shorter distance (closer to the mountain) than the valley clock. The faster-moving clock (the mountain clock) is reading the time as having passed more slowly than the slower-moving clock (the valley clock).
  • #1
Andrew Wright
120
19
In thousands of years time (when we have the technology to do almost anything) what would be the ideal demonstration of time dilation? Imagine I am a child.

ps.
Sorry if this post is over speculative. Feel free to move it if that helps.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Does anyone know if any of the NASA clocks used in time dilation experiments still exist? Are they in a museum somewhere and do they still show different numbers on them?
 
  • #3
With high-precision wristwatches, we could easily observe the clock-effect/twin-paradox.
 
  • #5
BvU said:

although the OP as a "child" might not appreciate this.
 
  • Like
Likes df508462, Comeback City and BvU
  • #6
robphy said:
With high-precision wristwatches, we could easily observe the clock-effect/twin-paradox.

So a futuristic factory could synchronise a set of high-precision watches when they are made. The watches could show the difference against other similar watches if they meet up again after say, a plane flight or space flight? (Without cheating by just using some sort of calculation).
 
  • #7
Andrew Wright said:
So a futuristic factory could synchronise a set of high-precision watches when they are made. The watches could show the difference against other similar watches if they meet up again after say, a plane flight or space flight? (Without cheating by just using some sort of calculation).

They wouldn't need any calculations. Different people could compare their wristwatches and confirm the effects of gravitational and relative-velocity-based time dilation after a flight, say. But, these differences would be tiny fractions of a second.

In order to see the significant results of time dilation, you would need long-term space flights. If some astronauts went off on a 20-year high-speed mission (Earth time) where they potentially only aged 10 years, then they would be quite clearly younger than their contempraries upon their return. Potentially, for longer high-speed space missions, the astronauts could return and meet their children as old people with grandchildren of their own. Or, even when everyone they ever knew was long dead and gone.

Whether we ever achieve this capability is another matter.
 
  • #8
Andrew Wright said:
In thousands of years time (when we have the technology to do almost anything) what would be the ideal demonstration of time dilation? Imagine I am a child.

ps.
Sorry if this post is over speculative. Feel free to move it if that helps.

if you accept the posit that c is invariant...then pretty much the existence of spacetime...or ability to perform comparable measures / physics should be acceptable as ideal enough lol

that said, asymmetric time dilation is most noticeable...for everyone :D gravitational time dilation

for a child or anyone really Pythagoras theorem & "light clock" is imo a great method...there is also MIT's slower speed of light game linked here
 
  • Like
Likes Andrew Wright
  • #9


https://www.nist.gov/news-events/ne...hes-new-us-time-standard-nist-f2-atomic-clock
https://www.wired.com/2014/04/nist-atomic-clock/
“NIST-F2 is accurate to one second in 300 million years,”... ##1.1\times 10^{-16}##
https://www.google.com/search?q=1/(300e6*pi*10^7)&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8

I would hope that in a thousand years, I could have this precision in my wristwatch.
For 1 m/s, ##(\gamma-1)=5\times10^{-18}##... that is the time-dilation factor is ##1.00+(5\times10^{-18})##
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=1/sqrt(1-(1/3e8)^2)-1

If I am interpreting the numbers correctly, crudely... do a roundtrip at about 1 m/s for about 20seconds...
 
  • #10
Andrew Wright said:
So a futuristic factory could synchronise a set of high-precision watches when they are made. The watches could show the difference against other similar watches if they meet up again after say, a plane flight or space flight? (Without cheating by just using some sort of calculation).

What each person measures on their wrist watch is called their proper time. So this would be a comparison of proper times. That is not the same thing as time dilation.

The easiest way to see this is that proper time is the time that elapses between two events that occur at the same place. In the language of relativity, this means that since your watch doesn't move relative to you, it's always in the same place relative to you.

Time dilation occurs when you compare the time between two events that occur in the same place (proper time) to a time that elapses between between those same two events, but those events occur in different places.

An example would be muon decay. Imagine a clock that the muon carries with it, and when it reaches an elapsed time of ##2.2\ \mu s## the muon decays. A physicist sets up two clocks, one on top of a mountain and another in a valley at the base of the mountain. These clocks are not located in the same place so he must synchronize two spatially separated clocks, and to do so he must follow some agreed-upon procedure. The muon passes the first clock and the time of passage is recorded on both the mountain clock and the muon clock. Then when the muon passes the valley clock the time on the muon clock and the time on the valley clock are recorded. The difference in the clock readings on the muon clock is a proper time. But the difference in the readings on the physicist's clocks is not a proper time. It is in fact larger than the elapsed time measured on the muon clock. It's dilated.

Note the lack of symmetry: The muon needs only one clock and the physicist needs two. On the muon's clock less than ##2.2\ \mu s## elapses, but on the physicist's clocks more than ##2.2\ \mu s## elapses. But the moun hasn't decayed!
 
  • #11
Mister T said:
Note the lack of symmetry: The muon needs only one clock and the physicist needs two. On the muon's clock less than ##2.2\ \mu s## elapses, but on the physicist's clocks more than ##2.2\ \mu s## elapses. But the moun hasn't decayed!

So basically it doesn't matter how old other people measure you to be, what matters is how much faster you move EDIT: err the greater the comparative speeds ...at least as far as physics is concerned.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
nitsuj said:
So basically it doesn't matter how old other people measure you to be,

How old I am is a measure of the amount of proper time that's elapsed on my clock. You'll agree on that regardless of how fast you move relative to me.
 
  • #13
robphy said:
I would hope that in a thousand years, I could have this precision in my wristwatch.

Perhaps one day ordinary people will be able to travel 1000 years into the future to find out what is there.
 
  • #14
Andrew Wright said:
Perhaps one day ordinary people will be able to travel 1000 years into the future to find out what is there.

No I haven't done the maths, and I'm sure that looks basically impossible :wink:
 
  • #15
Andrew Wright said:
Perhaps one day ordinary people will be able to travel 1000 years into the future to find out what is there.

Andrew Wright said:
No I haven't done the maths, and I'm sure that looks basically impossible :wink:

With time dilation and the clock effect, one could travel at high speed and return to the Earth when it is a thousand years from now and see what they have come up with, without you having aged a thousand years.
Unfortunately, you can't return to those you left at the start of your trip [and find them at the same age when you left] to tell them what you saw.
 
  • #16
nitsuj said:
.There is also MIT's slower speed of light game linked here

I wasn't expecting much when I downloaded this, just a few dull graphs and a maths game. It is awesome. Thank you.
 
  • #17
I believe that if your GPS didn't take into consideration its satellites' velocities and adjust for time dilation, they wouldn't work. No need to wait 1000 years.
 
  • #18
Chris Miller said:
I believe that if your GPS didn't take into consideration their satellites' velocities and adjust for time dilation, they wouldn't work.

The adjustment is actually done on the satellites; the time stamps they put into their signals are determined by applying a correction to their onboard clocks to account for both the satellites' velocities and their altitudes (the latter correction is actually larger and of the opposite sign, so the overall effect is to make the corrected clock rate, the one corresponding to Earth clocks, slower than the natural clock rate on the satellites). But yes, GPS would not work if SR and GR were not correct.
 
  • Like
Likes Chris Miller
  • #19
While GPS is an everyday application of time dilation, it's probably not an ideal demonstration of time dilation for a child to understand... other than saying that without it, we wouldn't have the precision we enjoy today.
 
  • #20
This thread is likely to run around in circles unless the OP tells us what is unsatisfactory about what we can do today - put an accurate clock on an airplane, fly somewhere and back, and compare with a stationary clock. Once we know that, we can narrow in on a satisfactory answer.
 
  • #21
How about just putting atomic clocks on different shelves?
 
  • #22
Mister T said:
How old I am is a measure of the amount of proper time that's elapsed on my clock. You'll agree on that regardless of how fast you move relative to me.

Sorry, my attempt at physics comedy lol
 
  • #23
I think my question has been answered.

The computer game is something I will show my children. I will also tell them that one day, people will be able to see how time has passed differently just by looking at their watch. And GPS and tiny particles from space teach us that the whole thing is real.

Thanks.
 
  • Like
Likes nitsuj and Mister T
  • #24
russ_watters said:
How about just putting atomic clocks on different shelves?

Would this work?
 
  • #25
Andrew Wright said:
Would this work?
If the clocks are accurate enough, yes.
 

1. What is time dilation?

Time dilation is a phenomenon in which time appears to pass at a different rate for objects moving at different speeds or in different gravitational fields. It is a consequence of Einstein's theory of relativity.

2. How is time dilation demonstrated?

Time dilation can be demonstrated through various experiments, such as the famous Hafele-Keating experiment in which atomic clocks were flown around the world on airplanes and compared to stationary clocks. The difference in time readings showed the effect of time dilation.

3. What is the ideal demonstration of time dilation?

The ideal demonstration of time dilation would involve a scenario in which one clock is moving at a high velocity, while another clock remains stationary. This would allow for a direct comparison of the time difference between the two clocks, providing clear evidence of time dilation.

4. Why is time dilation important?

Time dilation is important because it is a fundamental aspect of Einstein's theory of relativity, which has been proven to be incredibly accurate and has revolutionized our understanding of the universe. It also has practical applications, such as in the field of GPS navigation, where precise time measurements are crucial.

5. Can time dilation be observed in everyday life?

Yes, time dilation can be observed in everyday life, but the effects are very small and usually only noticeable at extremely high speeds or in strong gravitational fields. For example, astronauts in space experience time dilation compared to people on Earth due to the high speeds at which they travel.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
16
Views
638
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
986
Replies
2
Views
392
Replies
35
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
45
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
974
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
953
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
73
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
Back
Top