Discussion Overview
The discussion revolves around the exploration of experimental concepts proposed by Nobel prize winners that were not feasible at the time of their proposal but may now be realizable due to advancements in technology. Participants are interested in identifying other similar concepts and how to effectively search for them in the literature.
Discussion Character
- Exploratory
- Debate/contested
- Technical explanation
Main Points Raised
- One participant notes that the Nobel committee typically awards prizes for results with experimental proof, citing examples like the Higgs boson and gravitational waves, which were only recognized after experimental validation.
- Another participant clarifies that their inquiry is specifically about experimental ideas that were not implemented due to technological barriers, rather than theoretical concepts that lack experimental verification.
- The original poster expresses interest in finding literature on experimental concepts proposed in the past that could now be tested, emphasizing the distinction between theoretical and experimental ideas.
Areas of Agreement / Disagreement
There appears to be a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the original inquiry, with some participants focusing on theoretical concepts while the original poster seeks information on experimental ideas. This indicates a lack of consensus on the topic being discussed.
Contextual Notes
The discussion highlights the challenges in distinguishing between theoretical and experimental ideas, as well as the historical context of Nobel prize awards related to experimental validation.