Ideas from previous Nobel prize winners

  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ideas Nobel prize
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the exploration of experimental concepts proposed by Nobel Prize winners that were not feasible at the time of their introduction but may now be possible due to advancements in technology. Participants note that the Nobel committee typically awards prizes for ideas with experimental proof, which has delayed recognition for theories like the Higgs boson and gravitational waves until they could be experimentally validated. The original poster seeks guidance on how to conduct a literature search for these experimental ideas that have historical significance but lacked the necessary technology for implementation. The conversation highlights the distinction between theoretical predictions and experimental concepts that could be realized with current or near-future technological capabilities. Overall, the thread emphasizes the importance of identifying and revisiting these past experimental ideas as potential avenues for future research.
kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I just read this paper and it seems like that idea has been proposed about 30 years ago by a Nobel prize winner. I was wondering if there are other experimental concepts proposed in the past that scientists couldn't implement back then but nowadays we could (or in the near future). How can I make a literature search about that (other than finding it by chance)? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a somewhat common occurrence. The Nobel committee doesn't generally like to award the prize to theoretical results without some connection to experimental proof. That's why, e.g., awards for the Higgs boson, gravitational waves, etc., weren't given until the last decade, even though these phenomena were theoretically predicted back in the 1960's and 1970's.
 
Why is this Career Guidance?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Why is this Career Guidance?

Where should we move it? Other Physics, GD?
 
berkeman said:
Where should we move it? Other Physics, GD?
Moved to Other Physics Topics.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
berkeman said:
Where should we move it?
I'm not sure. I think there needs to be some OP input.
 
TeethWhitener said:
This is a somewhat common occurrence. The Nobel committee doesn't generally like to award the prize to theoretical results without some connection to experimental proof. That's why, e.g., awards for the Higgs boson, gravitational waves, etc., weren't given until the last decade, even though these phenomena were theoretically predicted back in the 1960's and 1970's.

Thank you for your reply. This is actually different from what I am asking for. These are theoretical concepts that can be tested experimentally, but there is no guarantee a priori that the theory is correct. For example Higgs boson was an appealing theory, but there were others (e.g. technicolor) aiming to explain the same thing. So there was a chance that the Higgs wasn't found, because it didn't exists. My question was about experimental ideas that were hard to be implemented in the past, but now we might have a chance. As in the paper I linked, that idea was proposed 30 years ago. The reason why it wasn't implemented was the technological barrier. But unlike the Higgs case, where we had no control on whether the Higgs boson is real at all or not, it was pretty clear that once we have the right tools we can implement that idea in that paper. My questions is about experimental, not theoretical ideas.
 
Back
Top