Ideas from previous Nobel prize winners

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter kelly0303
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ideas Nobel prize
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the exploration of experimental concepts proposed by Nobel prize winners that were not feasible at the time of their proposal but may now be realizable due to advancements in technology. Participants are interested in identifying other similar concepts and how to effectively search for them in the literature.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that the Nobel committee typically awards prizes for results with experimental proof, citing examples like the Higgs boson and gravitational waves, which were only recognized after experimental validation.
  • Another participant clarifies that their inquiry is specifically about experimental ideas that were not implemented due to technological barriers, rather than theoretical concepts that lack experimental verification.
  • The original poster expresses interest in finding literature on experimental concepts proposed in the past that could now be tested, emphasizing the distinction between theoretical and experimental ideas.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

There appears to be a misunderstanding regarding the nature of the original inquiry, with some participants focusing on theoretical concepts while the original poster seeks information on experimental ideas. This indicates a lack of consensus on the topic being discussed.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the challenges in distinguishing between theoretical and experimental ideas, as well as the historical context of Nobel prize awards related to experimental validation.

kelly0303
Messages
573
Reaction score
33
Hello! I just read this paper and it seems like that idea has been proposed about 30 years ago by a Nobel prize winner. I was wondering if there are other experimental concepts proposed in the past that scientists couldn't implement back then but nowadays we could (or in the near future). How can I make a literature search about that (other than finding it by chance)? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is a somewhat common occurrence. The Nobel committee doesn't generally like to award the prize to theoretical results without some connection to experimental proof. That's why, e.g., awards for the Higgs boson, gravitational waves, etc., weren't given until the last decade, even though these phenomena were theoretically predicted back in the 1960's and 1970's.
 
Why is this Career Guidance?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
Why is this Career Guidance?

Where should we move it? Other Physics, GD?
 
berkeman said:
Where should we move it? Other Physics, GD?
Moved to Other Physics Topics.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
berkeman said:
Where should we move it?
I'm not sure. I think there needs to be some OP input.
 
TeethWhitener said:
This is a somewhat common occurrence. The Nobel committee doesn't generally like to award the prize to theoretical results without some connection to experimental proof. That's why, e.g., awards for the Higgs boson, gravitational waves, etc., weren't given until the last decade, even though these phenomena were theoretically predicted back in the 1960's and 1970's.

Thank you for your reply. This is actually different from what I am asking for. These are theoretical concepts that can be tested experimentally, but there is no guarantee a priori that the theory is correct. For example Higgs boson was an appealing theory, but there were others (e.g. technicolor) aiming to explain the same thing. So there was a chance that the Higgs wasn't found, because it didn't exists. My question was about experimental ideas that were hard to be implemented in the past, but now we might have a chance. As in the paper I linked, that idea was proposed 30 years ago. The reason why it wasn't implemented was the technological barrier. But unlike the Higgs case, where we had no control on whether the Higgs boson is real at all or not, it was pretty clear that once we have the right tools we can implement that idea in that paper. My questions is about experimental, not theoretical ideas.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
14K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
4K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
3K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
890
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
9K