Ideas on Davidson Institute Fellows Scholarship

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Davidson Institute offers scholarships for gifted children under 18, requiring a research paper submission. Scholarships range from $10,000 to $50,000 based on the quality of the research. Participants are encouraged to focus on high-level projects in Mathematics, Engineering, or Science. A significant discussion point is the necessity of having a research advisor to guide students in producing extraordinary work, as mere participation without substantial research will not suffice for scholarship consideration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of research methodologies in Mathematics and Science.
  • Familiarity with the Riemann Hypothesis and its implications in number theory.
  • Knowledge of the scholarship requirements and evaluation criteria set by the Davidson Institute.
  • Experience in formulating and validating mathematical conjectures.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Riemann Hypothesis and its relevance to twin primes.
  • Explore effective methods for finding a research advisor in high school.
  • Study existing formulas for calculating areas of triangles and their derivations.
  • Investigate the scholarship application process and past winning projects for insights.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for gifted students under 18, educators guiding young researchers, and anyone interested in applying for the Davidson Institute Fellows Scholarship.

MevsEinstein
Messages
124
Reaction score
36
Hello Physics Forums!

There is a scholarship for gifted children under the age of 18 provided by Davidson Institute. What you need to do is write a research paper on a topic and then judges decide if the submitter should get a 50k scholarship, 25k scholarship, 10k scholarship, honorable mention, or nothing. For more information, click this link. Do you have any ideas on what to research? I am planning to submit on either Mathematics, Engineering, or Science.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You may be putting the cart before the horse. Accomplish first, worry about the reward second.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
You may be putting the cart before the horse. Accomplish first, worry about the reward second.
I agree. That is why I want ideas on what to do. The reward doesn’t matter really since participating gives me experience for later.
 
Hey I got an idea. How about I do what Riemann did in his paper and set up a hard problem? I got one in mind that can help us understand more about twin primes if my conjecture is proved.
 
How do you know whatever your conjecture is has not already been proven/disproven? It would likely not be sufficient just to pose a “hard” problem. You would have to do research to prove that the resolution to the conjecture being true or false would have far reaching consequences.

MevsEinstein said:
what Riemann did in his paper
Which one? He wrote a lot of papers.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
Orodruin said:
Which one? He wrote a lot of papers.
The one where he stated the Riemann hypothesis. I will continue my research on the conjecture. It is similar to the prime number theorem but it is about twin primes instead. And I will find out if it has already been proven which would be great.
 
  • #10
And it looks like the 2022 deadline has passed, so most likely you are thinking about what to work on for future year application periods...

The 2022 application deadline has passed.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
  • #11
berkeman said:
And it looks like the 2022 deadline has passed, so most likely you are thinking about what to work on for future year application periods...
Yes since I want to think of something so I have more time on working for the scholarship. Making research papers scare me, so I have to spend a lot of time.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #12
@berkeman thanks for liking my post! It hasn’t happened for a while.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman
  • #13
I made a new formula for finding the area of oblique triangles. Would this be a good idea?
 
  • #14
How do you know that it is a new formula?
Why would it be any more useful than already existing ones?
What makes it an extraordinary achievement?
 
  • #15
OP, I would strongly recommend you find a research advisor somehow. It is not unheard of for HS students to do original research, but it is very unlikely they’ll even know where to begin without a good mentor.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: MevsEinstein, pbuk and berkeman
  • #16
MevsEinstein said:
I made a new formula for finding the area of oblique triangles.
No, you didn't.
At best, you have rearranged the existing formula.
 
  • #17
Vanadium 50 said:
No, you didn't.
Does this already exist:
##K=\frac{\tan C (a^2+b^2-c^2)}{4}## I don't know tbh

After thinking about it, I won't use this formula for Davidson Institute since it requires four variables
TeethWhitener said:
OP, I would strongly recommend you find a research advisor somehow. It is not unheard of for HS students to do original research, but it is very unlikely they’ll even know where to begin without a good mentor.
Thanks for the advice!
 
  • #18
MevsEinstein said:
I don't know tbh
This is a big big warning flag.

If you do not know whether you made an extraordinary breakthrough or not, then the absolutely most likely scenario is that you have not.

Since your formula uses four variables (I have not checked its validity) it is essentially useless. The typical thing to know in a triangle are three independent quantities (at least one length and then lengths and angles). The other quantities can be expressed in terms of those three. Using four just complicates your formula for no good reason whatsoever.

The Davidson Institute wants real research that is extraordinary for your age. Simply spending an afternoon thinking about a project or a problem is not going to cut it even if you are a genius.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50
  • #19
I found my research advisor. You can close this thread now :)
 
  • #20
Orodruin said:
(I have not checked its validity
It's valid. It's a convoluted way of expressing height * length / 2. It's law of cosines to get you x^/2, the tangent turns it into xy/2.

Of course, taking a simple formula and obfuscating it is not a great accomplishment.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Orodruin
  • #21
I have a new formula for the area of a rectangle whose dimensions are W and L.

$$A = L \cdot \sqrt{W^2 + L^2} \cdot \sin( \arctan\left(\dfrac W L\right) )$$

My formula uses only two variables. Do I get a prize?
:oldbiggrin:
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: Delta2, Vanadium 50 and berkeman
  • #22
Sure you want sine and not \sqrt{1-\cos^2}?

Just trying to be helpful.
 
  • #23
Vanadium 50 said:
Sure you want sine and not \sqrt{1-\cos^2}?

Just trying to be helpful.
No, that change would make my formula overly complicated. My motto is "Endeavor to eschew obfuscation and de-emphasize the utilization of nonessential sesquipedalian pronouncements."
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vanadium 50

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K