MHB Identifying Vertical Asymptotes: A Non-Factoring Method

  • Thread starter Thread starter Teh
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Method Vertical
Click For Summary
Identifying vertical asymptotes can be challenging, especially with complex denominators. A non-factoring method is not widely recognized beyond graphing, but factoring the denominator can simplify the process. The denominator x^4 - 61x^2 + 900 can be transformed by substituting y = x^2, leading to the factorization of y^2 - 61y + 900. The correct factorization results in (x+5)(x+6)(x-5)(x-6), while the numerator requires careful attention to signs for accurate simplification. Ultimately, understanding the factorization process is crucial for determining vertical asymptotes effectively.
Teh
Messages
47
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6087
im stuck on identifying vertical asymptotes because of this nasty denominator. My professor telling me to factor it out but, is there different way to solve for the vertical asymptotes.
 

Attachments

  • 14642706_1490190584343062_450543411_n.jpg
    14642706_1490190584343062_450543411_n.jpg
    80 KB · Views: 106
Physics news on Phys.org
Teh said:
im stuck on identifying vertical asymptotes because of this nasty denominator. My professor telling me to factor it out but, is there different way to solve for the vertical asymptotes.
Other than graphing, not that I know of.

You need to factor [math]x^4 - 61x^2 + 900[/math]. If you set [math]y = x^2[/math] then you have to factor [math]y^2 - 61y + 900[/math]. Are you able to do that?

-Dan
 
i did! for the denominator it is (x+5) (x+6) (x-5) (x-6) for the top i am not sure
 
Teh said:
i did! for the denominator it is (x+5) (x+6) (x-5) (x-6) for the top i am not sure

Surely you can at least see some common factors...
 
yes also did tried it this is what i got 2x^2 (x^2 + x - 30) is equal to 2x^2 (x-6) (x+5)... then cancel it out with (x-6) (x+5)
 
Your factorization of the numerator is close, but not quite correct...check your signs. :D
 
ahhh okay (x+6) and (x-5) canceling with (x+6) (x-5) leaving 2x^2 / (x-6) (x+5)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K