Identity for exponential function with imaginary arguments

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The identity Exp[iw/2] - Exp[-iw/2] = Exp[iw] - 1 is confirmed through simplification. The left-hand side simplifies to 2i sin(w/2), while the right-hand side simplifies to cos(w) + i sin(w) - 1. This establishes the identity as valid. The discussion emphasizes the importance of using exponential forms rather than complicating the proof with trigonometric identities.

PREREQUISITES
  • Complex analysis fundamentals
  • Understanding of Euler's formula
  • Basic trigonometric identities
  • Familiarity with exponential functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Euler's formula in depth
  • Learn about complex function properties
  • Explore proofs of trigonometric identities
  • Investigate applications of complex exponentials in physics
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone interested in complex analysis and the properties of exponential functions.

ParityCheck
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I have seen the following identity used.
Exp[iw/2]-Exp[iw/2]=Exp[iw]-1
I can't find this in any book and I can't prove it myself.
The left side equals 2isin(w/2)
The right side equals cos(w)+isin(w)-1
On the face of it, that seems to make the identity absurd
How can one go about proving such an identity? Or is it wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Welcome to PF!

ParityCheck said:
Exp[iw/2]-Exp[iw/2]=Exp[iw]-1

How can one go about proving such an identity? Or is it wrong?

Hi ParityCheck ! Welcome to PF! :smile:

(eiw/2 - e-iw/2)eiw/2 = eiw - 1 :wink:
 
Thanks. I was making it way too complicated with trig identities and series and...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K