MHB If a and b are unit vectors....

Click For Summary
If vectors a and b are unit vectors and |a + b| = sqrt(2), the dot product (2a - b) · (a + 3b) simplifies to -1. This result arises because the condition |a + b| = sqrt(2) implies that a and b are orthogonal, leading to a · b = 0. The calculation shows that (2a - b) · (a + 3b) equals 5(a · b) - 1, which confirms the answer is indeed -1. The discussion clarifies how the zero product property applies in this context. Thus, the conclusion that the dot product equals -1 is validated.
Raerin
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
If a and b are unit vectors and |a + b| = sqrt(2). What is the value (dot product) of (2a-b).(a+3b)?

Is the answer -1 by any chance? If not...

I know how to find the dot product and find the magnitude and add vectors, etc. but I have never came across this a question before. I am very unclear on how to do it.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: If a nd b are unit vecotrs...

Raerin said:
If a and b are unit vectors and |a + b| = sqrt(2). What is the value (dot product) of (2a-b).(a+3b)?

Is the answer -1 by any chance? If not...

I know how to find the dot product and find the magnitude and add vectors, etc. but I have never came across this a question before. I am very unclear on how to do it.

Note that

\[\begin{aligned} (2\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b}) \cdot (\mathbf{a}+3\mathbf{b}) &= 2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{a} +6\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} -3\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{b} \\ &= 2\|\mathbf{a}\|^2 +5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 3\|\mathbf{b}\|^2\\ &= 5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 1\quad\text{since $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$ are unit vectors}\end{aligned}\]

Since $\|\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\| = \sqrt{2}$, squaring both sides and expanding via dot product leaves you with
\[\|\mathbf{a}\|^2+ 2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} + \|\mathbf{b}\|^2 = 2 \implies 2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} = 0\implies \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} = 0\]

Therefore, we now have that

\[(2\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b})\cdot (\mathbf{a}+3\mathbf{b}) = 5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 1 = -1\]

So yes, your answer is correct.
 
Re: If a nd b are unit vecotrs...

Chris L T521 said:
Note that

\[\begin{aligned} (2\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b}) \cdot (\mathbf{a}+3\mathbf{b}) &= 2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{a} +6\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} -3\mathbf{b}\cdot\mathbf{b} \\ &= 2\|\mathbf{a}\|^2 +5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 3\|\mathbf{b}\|^2\\ &= 5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 1\quad\text{since $\mathbf{a}$ and $\mathbf{b}$ are unit vectors}\end{aligned}\]

Since $\|\mathbf{a}+\mathbf{b}\| = \sqrt{2}$, squaring both sides and expanding via dot product leaves you with
\[\|\mathbf{a}\|^2+ 2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} + \|\mathbf{b}\|^2 = 2 \implies 2\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} = 0\implies \mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} = 0\]

Therefore, we now have that

\[(2\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b})\cdot (\mathbf{a}+3\mathbf{b}) = 5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 1 = -1\]

So yes, your answer is correct.

I don't understand how 2a . b = 0 becomes a . b = 0. Does the 2 become irrelevant if the dot product is 0?

Also, if a . b = 0 then 5a . b -1 be 5(0) - 1 and that's how you get -1?
 
Re: If a nd b are unit vecotrs...

Raerin said:
I don't understand how 2a . b = 0 becomes a . b = 0.

Also, if a . b = 0 then 5a . b -1 be 5(0) - 1 and that's how you get -1?

Since $\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b}$ is a scalar, then by the zero product property $2\mathbf{a}\cdot \mathbf{b} = 0$ implies that either $2=0$ (which is absurd) or $\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b}=0$ (which is the correct choice). With that result, you can now substitute zero in for $\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b}$ in the simplified form of $(2\mathbf{a}-\mathbf{b})\cdot(a+3\mathbf{b})$ to get $5\mathbf{a}\cdot\mathbf{b} - 1 = 5(0) - 1 = -1$.

I hope this clarifies things! (Bigsmile)
 
Here is a little puzzle from the book 100 Geometric Games by Pierre Berloquin. The side of a small square is one meter long and the side of a larger square one and a half meters long. One vertex of the large square is at the center of the small square. The side of the large square cuts two sides of the small square into one- third parts and two-thirds parts. What is the area where the squares overlap?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K