Deriving spherical unit vectors in terms of cartesian unit vectors

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the azimuthal angle unit vector \(\vec{\phi}\) in Cartesian coordinates through the cross product of the radial unit vector \(\vec{r}\) and the vertical unit vector \(\vec{z}\). The correct expression for \(\vec{\phi}\) is obtained as \(\vec{z} \times \vec{r} = <-\sin(\theta)\sin(\phi), \sin(\theta)\cos(\phi), 0>\). It is clarified that multiplying by \(1/\sin(\theta)\) is unnecessary, as the azimuthal unit vector is confined to the xy-plane, necessitating the condition \(\theta = \frac{\pi}{2}\) for accurate representation. The discussion references a PDF resource for further understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of spherical coordinates and their relation to Cartesian coordinates.
  • Familiarity with vector operations, specifically cross products.
  • Knowledge of trigonometric functions and their geometric interpretations.
  • Basic understanding of unit vectors in three-dimensional space.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of spherical coordinates from Cartesian coordinates.
  • Learn about vector calculus, focusing on cross products and their applications.
  • Explore trigonometric identities and their use in vector transformations.
  • Review the provided PDF resource for a deeper understanding of spherical coordinates.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students who are working with spherical coordinates and vector calculus will benefit from this discussion.

chipotleaway
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to find the azimuthal angle unit vector \vec{\phi} in the cartesian basis by taking the cross product of the radial and \vec{z} unit vectors.
\vec{z} \times \vec{r} = &lt;0, 0, 1&gt; \times &lt;sin(\theta)cos(\phi), sin(\theta)sin(\phi), cos(\theta)&gt; = &lt;-sin(\theta)sin(\phi), sin(\theta)cos(\phi), 0)&gt;

But the sin(\theta) shouldn't be there so we would have to multiply the cross product by 1/sin(\theta) to get the correct unit vector. But why do we need to do this if the magnitude is already one?

Also, how would you do this using trigonometry?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't actually divide by \sin\theta. Its just that the azimuthal unit vector relies completely on the xy plane and so you should set \theta=\frac \pi 2.
 
Thanks, that makes sense.I was following this .pdf
https://www.csupomona.edu/~ajm/materials/delsph.pdf
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K