If a plane has more than 2 principal axes ?

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter phydis
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Axes Plane
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concept of principal axes of symmetry in plane figures, specifically addressing the assertion that if a plane has more than two principal axes through a point, then every axis through that point must also be a principal axis. Participants clarify that while a circle exhibits this property, other shapes like squares and regular hexagons do not necessarily conform to this rule. The conversation highlights the need for precise definitions and context when discussing geometric properties, particularly in relation to non-Euclidean geometry.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of geometric concepts, particularly symmetry and axes of symmetry.
  • Familiarity with plane figures such as circles, squares, and regular hexagons.
  • Basic knowledge of Euclidean and non-Euclidean geometry.
  • Ability to interpret mathematical definitions and theorems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the properties of symmetry in various geometric shapes.
  • Study the definitions and implications of principal axes in geometry.
  • Explore non-Euclidean geometry and its differences from Euclidean principles.
  • Examine the concept of bilateral symmetry in polygons and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, geometry educators, students studying advanced geometry, and anyone interested in the properties of symmetry in plane figures.

phydis
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
" If a plane has more than 2 principal axes (axes of symmetry ) through a point, then every axis through that point must be a principal axis "

I can understand above statement regarding a circle, but square also has more than 2 principal axes, how can it be true for every axis of a square or a regular hexagon ?

someone please explain this..

Thank you!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
A "plane" has an infinite number of axes of symmetry through every point.

When you write "plane", I think you must mean more... plane figures, planer bound shapes, polygons?

Since you mention examples of a circle, square, and regular hexagon, if you mean such as that, I'm not sure what the idea means.

For further example, an equilateral triangle has three axes through the center point that are clearly symmetric (bilateral symmetry), but other lines through that midpoint do not show any symmetry.

Are you sure the statement is meant to apply to figures? The statement reads like a mangled and circular definition of a plane itself, or some kind of corollary concerning non-Euclidean geometry...?

What is the context?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
22K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
962
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
92
Views
5K
Replies
9
Views
4K