If acceleration is stated is terms of velocity....

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on converting acceleration expressed in terms of velocity into time, specifically addressing the equation a = v, which is dimensionally inconsistent. It emphasizes that such relationships can be treated as differential equations requiring integration to find time. The user explores an example with angular acceleration and derives the relationships through separation of variables, ultimately expressing velocity and position in terms of time. The importance of boundary conditions for solving arbitrary constants in the equations is also highlighted. The conversation concludes with a method for integrating and applying boundary conditions to determine specific solutions.
k_squared
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is not a particular problem but a generic one. If one has acceleration stated in terms of velocity (or position) such as a=v, how do we convert these values into time?

Homework Equations


ads=vdv
ad(theta)=wdw

And of course, the usual time-based derivative relations for acceleration, velocity and positions.

The Attempt at a Solution


Sorry, guys, this one is killing me right now.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
k_squared said:
such as a=v
First of all, this cannot be the relationship as it is dimensionally inconsistent.

Second, what you have is just a differential equation that you need to solve.
 
k_squared said:
such as a=v
You can use the integral-differential relationship between the two quantities. Also, a=v is dimensionally incorrect. The equation could be a=kv, where k has the unit of time-1.
 
Allright, clarified question... let's saw we have $$\alpha=50\sqrt{\omega}$$. This is, I believe, equivalent to the diffyQ $$y''=50\sqrt{y'}$$. The book solves the equation by taking from $$dw/dt=a $$ $$ dt=dw/a$$, and integrating with bounds that are suggested by the problem. Wolframalpha solves the problem by giving $$y=\frac{625t^3}{3}+c_1^2+25c_1t^2+c_2$$

So my real question is.. how do I reconcile these two, or am I wrong about something? (I can't find appropriate values of the constants of integration in the case of the last equation!)
 
In that case, ##y## is ##\theta## and the rest is the same, although I think Wolfram Alpha must have had a factor of ##t## on the ##c_1^2##, did it not?

Since ##\alpha = d\omega / dt##, you can rewrite the first equation as:

$$\frac{d\omega}{ dt} = 50\sqrt{\omega}$$

And then through separation of variables:

$$\frac{d\omega}{50\sqrt{\omega}} = dt$$

Then integrate both sides:

$$\frac{1}{50}\int\frac{d\omega}{\sqrt{\omega}} = \int dt$$

$$\frac{1}{25}\sqrt{\omega} = t + c_1$$

$$\omega= 625t^2 + 1250c_1t + 625c_1^2$$

Note that if we roll a factor of 25 into ##c_1##, this becomes:

$$\omega= 625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2$$

This is ok to do because the constants are arbitrary. And since ##\omega = d\theta / dt##, you can repeat the process:

$$\frac{d\theta}{dt} = 625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2$$

$$d\theta = (625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2) dt$$

$$\int d\theta = \int (625t^2 + 50c_1t + c_1^2) dt$$

$$\theta = \frac{625}{3}t^3 + 25c_1t^2 + c_1^2 t + c_2$$

As for the boundary conditions, you can redo the above using the boundary conditions as the limits of integration. Or, you can use the above equation to plug the values for ##y## and ##t## that you are given, and solve for the arbitrary constants. You'll need two conditions to solve for both constants.
 
  • Like
Likes PeroK
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Correct statement about a reservoir with an outlet pipe'
The answer to this question is statements (ii) and (iv) are correct. (i) This is FALSE because the speed of water in the tap is greater than speed at the water surface (ii) I don't even understand this statement. What does the "seal" part have to do with water flowing out? Won't the water still flow out through the tap until the tank is empty whether the reservoir is sealed or not? (iii) In my opinion, this statement would be correct. Increasing the gravitational potential energy of the...
Back
Top