IF north pole becomes the south pole....

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the hypothetical scenario of the Earth's North and South Poles switching places, exploring the implications for climate and geological processes. Participants clarify that the North Pole cannot literally become the South Pole due to the Earth's rotational axis. However, they discuss the concept of magnetic pole reversals, which have occurred multiple times throughout Earth's history without catastrophic consequences. The consensus is that while such a flip could lead to temporary climatic changes, it would not result in mass extinctions or significant long-term effects.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Earth's rotational axis and magnetic field dynamics
  • Knowledge of geological time scales and historical magnetic pole reversals
  • Familiarity with angular momentum and its conservation principles
  • Basic concepts of climate change and its drivers
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the history of Earth's magnetic field reversals and their geological implications
  • Study the effects of axial tilt and rotation on climate patterns
  • Explore the concept of angular momentum in planetary science
  • Investigate the geological history of Mars and its axial changes
USEFUL FOR

Geophysicists, climate scientists, educators, and anyone interested in planetary science and the dynamics of Earth's magnetic field.

@PK nd
Messages
25
Reaction score
2
what would happen if north pole of Earth becomes south pole and south becomes north ?
What would be the chenges on Earth's climate or any other changes ??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
@PK nd said:
what would happen if north pole of Earth becomes south pole and north becomes south ?
What would be the chenges on Earth's climate or any other changes ??

I thought the north pole already was the south pole!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cuong Nguyen and 1oldman2
PeroK said:
I thought the north pole already was the south pole!
i edited it
sorry
 
@PK nd said:
what would happen if north pole of Earth becomes south pole and south becomes north ?
What would be the chenges on Earth's climate or any other changes ??

It would make no difference, as far as I know. There is a period in between in which the magnetic field is reduced, which would allow more radiation to come to earth. But this has happened before many times without mass extinctions or anything like that. I think there would be some effect on climate, but I don't know what.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Cuong Nguyen and @PK nd
@PK nd said:
what would happen if north pole of Earth becomes south pole and south becomes north ?

Could you describe in detail what you mean? As the poles are defined by the rotational axis the north pole cannot become the south pole. Thus I guess you mean something different.
 
DrStupid said:
Could you describe in detail what you mean? As the poles are defined by the rotational axis the north pole cannot become the south pole. Thus I guess you mean something different.
lets just imagine for a moment .
 
@PK nd said:
lets just imagine for a moment .

What?
 
DrStupid said:
Could you describe in detail what you mean? As the poles are defined by the rotational axis the north pole cannot become the south pole. Thus I guess you mean something different.
I guess we are being asked, what if the Magnetic North Pole moved from near the True North Pole to near the True South Pole?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: @PK nd
Aren't we being asked about when N and S flip and change places? This has happened already as described by Hornbein. There are strips of NSNSNSNS iron molecules to be found on the sea bead in one or more of the trenches. Don't ask me for a reference but it's well enough known to be in GCSE textbooks, as I remember.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vedward, @PK nd and davenn
  • #10
DrGreg said:
I guess we are being asked, what if the Magnetic North Pole moved from near the True North Pole to near the True South Pole?

That's one possibility. Another interpretations would be flipping Earth's rotational axis relative to the ecliptic or flipping Earth relative to it's rotational axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: sophiecentaur and @PK nd
  • #11
Since the OP refuses to ask when answered, guessing what he means is probably going to be fruitless.
 
  • #12
i mean flipping Earth relative to it's rotational axis.
 
  • #13
Vanadium 50 said:
Since the OP refuses to ask when answered, guessing what he means is probably going to be fruitless.
there's a huge time difference between the world and India so man it was night when you all were guessing. What i meant ?
I am really sorry.
 
  • #14
@PK nd said:
i mean flipping Earth relative to it's rotational axis.

The Earth's' magnetic field has flipped man y many times over the millions of years

googling such will give you lots of hits
 
  • #15
davenn said:
The Earth's' magnetic field has flipped man y many times over the millions of years

googling such will give you lots of hits
thnx
 
  • #16
Last I heard the magnet pole was somewhere in Canada, heading on its way to Britain, is that right?
 
  • #17
Jim60 said:
Last I heard the magnet pole was somewhere in Canada, heading on its way to Britain, is that right?

currently under the Arctic Ocean and going by those predictions, is going to pass by the Nth Geographic Pole and across into Russia region

magnet6.jpg
but considering its wild motions over the last 2000 yrs,, I would be surprised if its future location
could be calculated with any accuracy. I have seen a staggering drunk man do straighter paths :-p:biggrin:

Magnetic_North_Pole_Positions_200AD.jpg
Dave
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1oldman2, Jim60 and anorlunda
  • #18
@PK nd said:
i mean flipping Earth relative to it's rotational axis.
That is never going to happen and the question is a bit like the "what would happen if you took the Sun away?" type questions.
Flipping the magnetic poles has been a common occurrence.
 
  • #19
Amazing. After 18 posts, we still don't know what the OP's question is. He says it's flipping the entire Earth with respect to the rotational axis, someone answers as if he said flipping the magnetic poles, and he says "thanks". Well, "thnx". Apparently it's only worth 4 letters to thank us and not all six.

In an act of reckless optimism, let me ask yet again: "What exactly are you asking?"
 
  • #20
@PK nd said:
i mean flipping Earth relative to it's rotational axis.

That strongly depends on the time scale. If the process is as slowly as the normal continental drift nothing special would happen.
sophiecentaur said:
That is never going to happen

Something like that already happened to Mars. The crust has been flipped relative to the axis by 20-25°. Thus the question is not as absurd as you seem to think.
 
  • #21
thanx for your replies .
I now got my answer .
 
  • #22
DrStupid said:
Something like that already happened to Mars. The crust has been flipped relative to the axis by 20-25°. Thus the question is not as absurd as you seem to think.
What happens to Angular Momentum though? 20 - 25° is not a lot compared with 180°; just a tilt and who knows what was the situation just before the event?
The core would have to be rotating much faster than it is to compensate for the 'outside bits' going in reverse.
 
  • #23
sophiecentaur said:
What happens to Angular Momentum though?

Nothing.

sophiecentaur said:
20 - 25° is not a lot compared with 180°

Yes, of course. But it shows that such a process is possible.

sophiecentaur said:
The core would have to be rotating much faster than it is to compensate for the 'outside bits' going in reverse.

I'm afraid you have a wrong impression of the process we are talking about. The angular momentum of the crust doesn't change and therefore doesn't need to be compensated. You could even flip the whole planet upside-down without changing it's angular momentum.
 
  • #24
If we are talking of the magnetic poles shifting, nothing much would happen, and there is geological evidence of this happening before without any major consequences.
(Perhaps the Earth would receive somewhat higher solar radiation while the changeover is in progress.)
If we are talking of the rotational axis changing then the only way that could happen would be due to very strong gravitational interaction between the Earth and another large body, or possibly a collision.
Since the planets in the solar system are now settled into stable predictable orbits this isn't going to happen, at least not in any time scale relevant to humans.
If it did hypothetically occur it would likely induce chaotic climate changes, but this would settle eventually into some kind of seasonal pattern similar to the pattern at present.
 
  • #25
DrStupid said:
Nothing.
Yes, of course. But it shows that such a process is possible.
I'm afraid you have a wrong impression of the process we are talking about. The angular momentum of the crust doesn't change and therefore doesn't need to be compensated. You could even flip the whole planet upside-down without changing it's angular momentum.
I think you would have to agree that the total angular momentum must be unchanged if there's no external influence. So, if you want the rotation to change, how can you change the sign?

This is what my answers are all based on:
@PK nd said:
i mean flipping Earth relative to it's rotational axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: @PK nd
  • #26
Consider taking a sphere inside a spherical shell and set them spinning at the same rates (ω) around an axis. Allow them to have the same MI values. In the inner sphere, there is a motor which applies a torque and rotates one of the axes relative to the other so that it is inverted. The Angular momentum of the outer shell will have changed by -2Iω and the inner sphere has to have changed its momentum by 2Iω. Is that remotely feasible? Where would the energy come from to support this and to produce four times the rotational Kinetic Energy.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: @PK nd
  • #27
sophiecentaur said:
So, if you want the rotation to change, how can you change the sign?

The angular momentum doesn't change.

sophiecentaur said:
This is what my answers are all based on:

No, your answer is based on a flipped axis but we are talking about a flipped Earth relative to an (almost) unchanged axis.
 
  • #28
DrStupid said:
we are talking about a flipped Earth relative to an (almost) unchanged axis.
You'll have to explain how the Earth you refer to has no MI - or how much of the Earth's mass is involved in this flip. Or even how you would describe the mapping between start and end of your process?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: @PK nd
  • #29
What do you mean , the total mass of Earth would be flipped
 
  • #30
The question from SophieCentaur seems apt. We need some terminology or metaphor to describe the process called a "flip". When all is said and done, there should be a mapping for each mass element within the Earth from its starting position pre-flip to its ending position post-flip.

In order for the physical process to be realizable, the mapping should be achievable through a continuous deformation. So, for instance, it is not fair to simply wave ones hands and declare "reverse the latitude for every point on the crust of the earth", thereby ending up with Great Britain in the southern hemisphere and Antarctica positioned at the North pole. But it would be fair play to rotate the continental plates containing North and South America on an imaginary axis through Equador and wind up with North America in the southern hemisphere.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K