MHB If R is a domain , then units in R[x] are non-zero constants

Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
I am reading Joseph Rotman's book Advanced Modern Algebra.

I need help with Problem 2.21 Part (i) on page 94.

Problem 2.21 Part (i) reads as follows:

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Let $$R$$ be a domain. Prove that if a polynomial in $$R[x]$$ is a unit, then it is a nonzero constant.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Now presumably the proof goes something like the following:

$$p(x)$$ is a unit $$ \Longrightarrow \exists \ q(x) \text{ such that } p(x)q(x) =1 $$

$$ \Longrightarrow p(x) \text{ possesses an inverse } [p(x)]^{-1}$$

$$ \Longrightarrow p(x) $$ is a nonzero constant

... ... BUT ...? ... what is a rigorous way to show that $$ p(x) $$ possesses an inverse $$ \Longrightarrow p(x) $$ is a nonzero constant

I would appreciate help in this matter.

Peter
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that $p(x)q(x) = 1$.

Write: $p(x) = a_0 + a_1x + a_2x^2 + \cdots + a_mx^m$ and:

$q(x) = b_0 + b_1x + b_2x^2 + \cdots + b_nx^n$

and furthermore stipulate that we have "no extra terms" so that $a_m,b_n \neq 0$

Then $p(x)q(x) = a_0b_0 + (a_0b_1 + a_1b_0)x + (a_0b_2 + a_1b_1 + a_2b_0)x^2 + \cdots + a_mb_nx^{m+n}$.

Thus:

$a_0b_0 = 1$
$a_0b_1 + a_1b_0 = 0$
$a_0b_2 + a_1b_1 + a_2b_0 = 0$
...
$a_mb_n = 0$

The last equation is impossible in an integral domain, by our restriction on $a_m,b_n$...UNLESS...$m = n = 0$.

But this means we have:

$p(x) = a_0$
$q(x) = b_0$

and since $a_0b_0 = 1$, these are both units in $R$, and the units in $R$ are of necessity non-zero (they cannot even be zero divisors).
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K