If the height of the water slide is h = 3.2m and the person's initial

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on calculating the splashdown location of a swimmer on a water slide with a height of 3.2 meters and an initial speed of 0.54 m/s. Participants emphasize the importance of using conservation of energy principles, specifically the equation mgh + 1/2 mv^2, to determine the swimmer's velocity at the bottom of the slide. The key confusion arises from the correct interpretation of height (h) in the energy equation, where Δh represents the change in height rather than absolute heights. Participants clarify that the reference level for potential energy can be set at the water level, leading to a more accurate calculation of the swimmer's final speed.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of conservation of energy principles in physics
  • Familiarity with potential energy and kinetic energy equations
  • Basic knowledge of projectile motion and its calculations
  • Ability to interpret diagrams related to physics problems
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the conservation of energy in mechanical systems
  • Learn how to apply the mgh and 1/2 mv^2 equations in practical scenarios
  • Explore projectile motion calculations, particularly in relation to vertical drops
  • Review how to set reference levels in potential energy problems
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of motion on inclined surfaces.

Cody
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
"If the height of the water slide is h = 3.2m and the person's initial speed at point A (at the top of slide) is 0.54m/s, at what location does the swimmer splash down in the pool?"

I saw a thread with the same question back from 2005 but it is now closed.
I understand that you have to use conservation of energy at point A and at the bottom of the slide to find velocity at the bottom of the slide, then use the formula x = v√2y/g.

I am however confused with the following:
Why can I not substitute the exact values for h into the formula i.e
mgh + 1/2 mv^2 = mgh + 1/2 mv^2
since it is known, but rather have to use h-1.50(for the bottom) and 1.50(for the top)

Hope someone understands what I am asking.
Any help is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cody said:
I am however confused with the following:
Why can I not substitute the exact values for h into the formula i.e
mgh + 1/2 mv^2 = mgh + 1/2 mv^2
since it is known, but rather have to use h-1.50(for the bottom) and 1.50(for the top)
You need to provide a diagram (or simply a link to the original problem). Or at least describe the slide in more detail.

What matters when calculating the velocity at the bottom of the slide is Δh. So as long as you get that right, your proposed method should work fine.

You can use any point as your reference level, where y = 0.
 
Found out how to attach a link. here's the picture
 

Attachments

  • Picture1.png
    Picture1.png
    9.3 KB · Views: 966
Last edited:
Find the change in potential energy from the top of the slide to the bottom. Use this to find the final speed of the girl.

We can worry about where she lands afterwards.
 
Cody said:
Found out how to attach a link. here's the picture
Good.

Cody said:
but rather have to use h-1.50(for the bottom) and 1.50(for the top)
I have no idea why you think you have to use this (which is wrong, by the way).

The diagram shows the height of the bottom of the slide to be 1.50 m; the height at the top is that plus an additional "h".
 
This is the solution I have. If I substitute the exact values for h (i.e. 1.50 at the bottom of the slide and 3.2 at the top), I don't get the same answer. I don't know if I am doing something wrong or if you just cannot substitute the exact values for h into your equation, but rather have to use h+1.50 and h.
 

Attachments

  • Picture2.png
    Picture2.png
    42.5 KB · Views: 1,504
Cody said:
This is the solution I have. If I substitute the exact values for h (i.e. 1.50 at the bottom of the slide and 3.2 at the top), I don't get the same answer. I don't know if I am doing something wrong or if you just cannot substitute the exact values for h into your equation, but rather have to use h+1.50 and h.
I think you are getting confused about the meaning of "h" in this problem. Here, h is simply the change in height of the slide from top to bottom; h is not the distance from the top of the slide to the water level.

In your formula for potential energy, use ##mgy## instead of ##mgh##, where "y" is the vertical position measured from the water level. ##y_A## ≠ 3.2. (h = 3.2)

Your first job is to figure out what ##y_A## and ##y_B## equal.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
703
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
9K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
9K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
6K