If the Moon's Perigee was closer, could that result in earthquakes?

  • Thread starter Thread starter DeliriousEncore
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Earthquake Moon
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the hypothetical scenario of the Moon being in a more extreme elliptical orbit, particularly with a significantly closer perigee to Earth. Participants explore the potential effects of this change, including its implications for earthquakes, tidal phenomena, and other geological or atmospheric consequences.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants speculate that a closer Moon could lead to more frequent or severe earthquakes, though this remains uncertain.
  • One participant suggests that a dramatically larger Moon could create visual and environmental chaos, including massive tidal waves and widespread volcanism.
  • There is a discussion about the gravitational effects of the Moon on Earth, with one participant proposing that the Moon's proximity could lead to the Earth’s gravity pulling dust and rocks from the Moon, resulting in meteor showers.
  • Another participant mentions the possibility of the Moon's proximity affecting the Earth's rotation, although they express uncertainty about the accuracy of this claim.
  • Some participants note that small earthquakes are already influenced by 'earth tides', which are caused by the Moon's gravitational pull on Earth.
  • There is a caution regarding terminology, with participants discussing the common confusion between 'tidal waves' and 'tsunamis'.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express various hypotheses and concerns regarding the effects of a closer Moon, but there is no consensus on the specific outcomes or the validity of the claims made. Multiple competing views and uncertainties remain present throughout the discussion.

Contextual Notes

Some claims rely on assumptions about gravitational interactions and geological responses that are not fully explored or validated within the discussion. The potential for correlation between moon phases and significant earthquakes is mentioned but lacks definitive evidence.

DeliriousEncore
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
If for any reason, the moon were forced into a more extreme elliptical orbit to earth where its perigee was much closer to earth and its apogee was much farther, what kind of affects would we expect to see?

Also, would the moon's perigee cause more frequent or more severe earthquakes?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
DeliriousEncore said:
If for any reason, the moon were forced into a more extreme elliptical orbit to earth where its perigee was much closer to earth and its apogee was much farther, what kind of affects would we expect to see?

Also, would the moon's perigee cause more frequent or more severe earthquakes?
Dammit, I already answered these questions in the other thread. It's frustrating when I feel my efforts are being ignored and disregarded. I don't get paid to do this.

I think your idea is both fresh and has a lot of visual potential that would attract Hollywood. A Moon with ten or more times the apparent diameter of what we have now would be a very dramatic image, especially when accompanied by huge tidal waves, widespread volcanism, and gargantuan earthquakes. As they said in Motown days, "nowhere to run to baby, nowhere to hide."

While the Moon can't cross the Roche limit (it's too big) I believe that this is just an approximation. Once the Moon gets close enough the gravitational attraction of the Earth at the near surface of the Moon has got to be greater than the Moon's gravity there. That would have meant Earth's gravity sucking dust and rocks off of the Moon, causing meteor showers. I figure that would begin to happen when the center of the Moon is about 20,000 km from the center of the Earth so that the surfaces are 10,000 km apart. As the Moon gets even closer this increases rapidly eventually causing a stupendous deluge of meteors.

Then there is the ultimate, collision with the Earth. First there could be a near miss that would brush the atmosphere causing tremendous winds. I suppose an actual collision would boil the oceans. How apocalyptic can you get?

I will quibble that hardly anyone calls them tidal waves. They are just plain old "tides." You have seen the sort of confusion wreaked by the "tidal waves" moniker. Stick with tides. That's my advice.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: OmCheeto and DeliriousEncore
Hornbein said:
Dammit, I already answered these questions in the other thread. It's frustrating when I feel my efforts are being ignored and disregarded. I don't get paid to do this.

I think your idea is both fresh and has a lot of visual potential that would attract Hollywood. A Moon with ten or more times the apparent diameter of what we have now would be a very dramatic image, especially when accompanied by huge tidal waves, widespread volcanism, and gargantuan earthquakes. As they said in Motown days, "nowhere to run to baby, nowhere to hide."

While the Moon can't cross the Roche limit (it's too big) I believe that this is just an approximation. Once the Moon gets close enough the gravitational attraction of the Earth at the near surface of the Moon has got to be greater than the Moon's gravity there. That would have meant Earth's gravity sucking dust and rocks off of the Moon, causing meteor showers. I figure that would begin to happen when the center of the Moon is about 20,000 km from the center of the Earth so that the surfaces are 10,000 km apart. As the Moon gets even closer this increases rapidly eventually causing a stupendous deluge of meteors.

Then there is the ultimate, collision with the Earth. First there could be a near miss that would brush the atmosphere causing tremendous winds. I suppose an actual collision would boil the oceans. How apocalyptic can you get?

I will quibble that hardly anyone calls them tidal waves. They are just plain old "tides." You have seen the sort of confusion wreaked by the "tidal waves" moniker. Stick with tides. That's my advice.
I did read your answers in the last thread and thank you for that. I was not ignoring those answers, but I wanted to restate my questions as the focus in this thread so that if I received any additional feedback or answers, it would actually be on this topic since everyone else in that thread was ignoring my further questions to talk about the semantics of terminology.
I was also curious if there was any other possibilities that were not already presented, and its useful to have answers from more than a single individual for a variety of reasons, especially since we are dealing with a hypothetical scenario.
As an example, I had read somewhere that the moon becoming much closer to earth could potentially speed up the earths rotation, which I was unsure if that was an accurate prediction, but if did make me curious of what other things that would happen to earth that many people would overlook or that people like myself who are not as educated in physics would not think of.

Regarding the tides things, yes, I believe you are correct. When people say "tidal waves", they usually mean tsunamis even though that is incorrect and that tidal waves are not even commonly used to refer to tides. You advice has been heard.
 
IIRC, we already get 'some' small earth-quakes due to 'earth tides'. As ground rises and falls by up to a metre daily, something has to give. Apparently radio-astronomers, nuclear physicists (eg CERN Ring) and gravitational wave hunters (due to long optical paths) routinely make allowances for this 'wriggling'...

IIRC, there was intense discussion some years ago when an apparent correlation was found between 'significant' earth-quakes and moon-phase. Like the recent hunt for a trans-Neptunian planet based on clustered Kuiper-belt orbit inclinations, encouraging early findings gradually lost significance (n-sigma) given a bigger data-set...

Plus, a 'language' caution: Yes, 'Tsunami' is commonly translated 'Tidal Wave'. IIRC, it better translates as 'Harbour Wave', literally one that catches you when you thought you were in a safe harbour...
Of course, such are even worse when they coincide with a high tide and/or storm surge...

Nik-note: Sorry, I can't seem to get usual Alt-code for stats' sigma to work here...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
813
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 58 ·
2
Replies
58
Views
6K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
7K