If ##x> 1## and ##x^2 <2##, prove ##x < y##, ##y^2<2##

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Real analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that for rational numbers ##x \in \mathbb{Q}## where ##x > 1## and ##x^2 < 2##, there exists a rational number ##y \in \mathbb{Q}## such that ##x < y## and ##y^2 < 2##. The proof involves defining ##\alpha = \text{min}\left\{\frac{(2-x^2)}{4x}, 2x\right\}## and demonstrating that ##y = x + \beta##, where ##\beta## is a small positive rational number, satisfies the required conditions. The discussion also touches on alternative approaches to simplifying the proof and the implications for Dedekind cuts in rational numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of rational numbers, specifically ##\mathbb{Q}##.
  • Familiarity with inequalities and quadratic equations.
  • Knowledge of Dedekind cuts and their significance in real analysis.
  • Basic algebraic manipulation and proof techniques in mathematics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Dedekind cuts in detail.
  • Learn about quadratic inequalities and their solutions.
  • Explore alternative proof techniques in real analysis, particularly for limits and convergence.
  • Investigate the implications of rational approximations to irrational numbers.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of rational numbers and their relationship to irrational numbers, particularly in the context of proofs involving limits and convergence.

issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Suppose ##x \in \mathbb{Q}## and ##x > 1## and ## x^2 < 2##. I need to come up with some ##y \in \mathbb{Q}## such that ##x < y## and ## y^2 < 2##. Here is my attempt. Give that ##x > 1## and ## x^2 < 2##, I have ## (2-x^2) > 0## and ##4x > 0##. Also, ##2x >0##. Now define

$$ \alpha = \text{ min} \Bigl\{ \frac{(2-x^2)}{4x}, 2x \Bigl\} $$

It can be seen that ##\alpha > 0##. Also, I have

$$ \alpha \leqslant \frac{(2-x^2)}{4x} \cdots \cdots (1) $$
$$ \alpha \leqslant 2x \cdots \cdots (2)$$

Since ##x \in \mathbb{Q}##, it can be seen that ##\alpha \in \mathbb{Q}##. Since ##\alpha > 0##, there exists some ##\beta \in \mathbb{Q}## such that ## 0 < \beta < \alpha ##. From above equations, it follows that

$$ 0 < \beta < \frac{(2-x^2)}{4x} \cdots \cdots (3) $$
$$ 0 < \beta < 2x \cdots \cdots (4)$$

This simplifies to the following

$$ x^2 + 4x \beta < 2 $$
$$ \beta^2 < 2\beta x $$

Now consider ##(x + \beta)^2##

$$ (x + \beta)^2 = x^2 + 2\beta x + \beta^2 $$

Using above inequalities, I have

$$ (x + \beta)^2 = x^2 + 2\beta x + \beta^2 < x^2 + 2\beta x + 2\beta x $$
$$ x^2 + 2\beta x + 2\beta x = x^2 + 4 \beta x < 2 $$

Hence ## (x + \beta)^2 < 2 ##. Now, let ## y = x + \beta ##. Due to closure of ##\mathbb{Q}##, it can be seen that ##y \in \mathbb{Q}##. Also
## x < y## and finally ## y^2 < 2##.

Is this proof good enough ?
Thanks

[Moderator's note: moved from a technical forum.]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I take it easy as follows.
1<x and ##x^2##<2 imply ##1<x<\sqrt{2}##
For all x < y and ##y^2##<2 imply y=##\{\varnothing\}##
For some x < y and ##y^2##<2 imply x<y<##\sqrt{2}##.
 
This is probably intended to prove that ##\sqrt{2}## exists so that's probably not sufficient annuta.

Issac, i think your proof is good but complicated. You can just define ##\alpha## to be 9/10 of your definition, and then you don't need to also define ##\beta##.

The bigger win is learning how to avoid having to min multiple complicated expressions. You can assume ##\alpha## is small, which if it's less than 1 ##\alpha^2 < \alpha##. So ##(x+\alpha)^2 < x^2+(2x+1)\alpha##, which makes picking ##\alpha## really easy, ##\frac{9}{10}min(1,(2-x^2)/(2x+1)##.

Starting off by assuming your number will be really small often makes the proof a lot shorter, and more intuitive since the interesting case is going to be when ##x^2## is close to 2.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: mfb and anuttarasammyak
For any x such as
##2-x^2:=\epsilon>0##
There exists y such that
##2-y^2=\alpha \epsilon## where 0<##\alpha##<1
So
##x^2<y^2<2##
thus ##1<x<y## and ##y^2<2##
 
Last edited:
Suppose we wanted to construct a strictly increasing sequence of rationals starting with x_0 = 1 such that x_n \to \sqrt{2} as n \to \infty. One method is to start with x^2 = 2 and add x to both sides: <br /> x + x^2 = x + 2. Now dividing by x + 1 gives us <br /> x = \dfrac{x + 2}{x + 1} so a starting point is x_{n+1} = f(x_n) \equiv \frac{x_n+2}{x_n+1}. Although \sqrt{2} is a stable fixed point of this iteration, the convergence is not monotonic (f&#039;(\sqrt{2}) \in (-1,0)); but we can fix that by taking two steps of this iteration, yielding <br /> x_{n+1} = (f \circ f)(x_n) = \frac{4 + 3x_n}{3 + 2x_n}. You can then easily verify that if x^2 &lt; 2 then x &lt; (f \circ f)(x) and ((f \circ f)(x))^2 &lt; 2.
 
Thanks for replies. Actually, I was trying to prove that ##\{x : x^2 <2 \text { or } x < 0 \} ## is a Dedekind left set. So, what I asked here is part of that proof, where I am showing that the above set does not have a maximal element. Since Dedekind cuts are defined in terms of rational numbers, I can't use any non-rational numbers here.
 
IssacNewton said:
Since Dedekind cuts are defined in terms of rational numbers, I can't use any non-rational numbers here.
Let
x=\frac{m}{n},y=\frac{am+1}{an}
where a, m and n are positive integers.
y^2&lt;2
(2n^2-m^2)a^2-2ma-1&gt;0
Quadratic equation of a
(2n^2-m^2)a^2-2ma-1=0
has two real solutions. We know that a, which should be larger than the larger solution, have integer solutions for the inequality.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
Hello anuttarasammyak, we have to prove that ## y^2 < 2##. You are assuming it to begin with. Also, I did not understand your last line. Can you explain ?
 
IssacNewton said:
Hello @anuttarasammyak, we have to prove that ## y^2 < 2##. You are assuming it to begin with. Also, I did not understand your last line. Can you explain ?
In the second sentence of the Original Post in this tread, you stated:
IssacNewton said:
I need to come up with some ##y \in \mathbb{Q}## such that ##x<y## and ##y^2 < 2## .
All that @anuttarasammyak has done is to show a way to come up with such a ##y## .
 
  • #10
IssacNewton said:
Hello anuttarasammyak, we have to prove that ## y^2 < 2##. You are assuming it to begin with. Also, I did not understand your last line. Can you explain ?
Let  
x=\frac{m}{n} &lt; \frac{Am+1}{An}=y
where A, m and n are positive integers and ##m^2 < 2n^2##.
We want to prove that there exist A which satisfies
y^2&lt;2
which is written as the quadratic inequality,
(2n^2-m^2)A^2-2mA-1&gt;0.
The associated quadratic equation
(2n^2-m^2)x^2-2mx-1=0
has two real opposite sign solutions, say ##\alpha < 0 <\beta##. Any positive integer A > ##\beta## satisfies the inequality thus also satisfies ##y^2<2##.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Ok I see it now. So, we have a parabola in the variable A and since this is upward opening parabola, for any positive integer greater than ##\beta##, the inequality would be positive. Great. My solution is actually smaller on paper, but I had to explain to the audience here, so it looks long.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: anuttarasammyak

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
49
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
2K