If $x^{3/2}+y^{3/2}=r^{3/2}$, then $u=r$ and $v=r-x$.

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on transforming the integral $\iint_D f(x,y) dx dy$ over the region defined by the inequality $x^{\frac{3}{2}}+y^{\frac{3}{2}} \leq \alpha^{\frac{3}{2}}$ into a triangular region in the $uv$-plane. The proposed transformations involve defining $u = (x^{\frac{3}{2}} + y^{\frac{3}{2}})^{\frac{2}{3}}$ and exploring the relationship for $v$, leading to the conclusion that $v = -u + 2$ under specific conditions. The discussion emphasizes the need to visualize the region and the transformations to facilitate integration.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of double integrals in calculus
  • Familiarity with coordinate transformations
  • Knowledge of inequalities in the context of geometric regions
  • Basic concepts of polar coordinates and their applications
NEXT STEPS
  • Research the Jacobian determinant for variable transformations in integrals
  • Learn about the properties of the $L^p$ spaces and their applications in integration
  • Explore graphical methods for visualizing regions defined by inequalities
  • Study the implications of changing variables in multivariable calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, calculus students, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and coordinate transformations in the context of multivariable calculus.

mathmari
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
4,984
Reaction score
7
Hey! :o

Let $D$ be the space in the first quadrant of the $xy$-plane that is defined by the inequality $x^{\frac{3}{2}}+y^{\frac{3}{2}} \leq \alpha^{\frac{3}{2}}$ with $\alpha>0$. I want to transform $\iint_D f(x,y) dx dy$ to an integral on the triangle $E$ of the $uv$-plane that is defined by the inequalities $0 \leq u \leq \alpha$ and $0 \leq v \leq \alpha-u$.
Which new variables do we define here? (Wondering) Do we maybe define the following variables?
$$u=\left (x^{\frac{3}{2}}+y^{\frac{3}{2}}\right )^{\frac{2}{3}}$$ Then we would get $0\leq \left (x^{\frac{3}{2}}+y^{\frac{3}{2}}\right )^{\frac{2}{3}}\leq \left (a^{\frac{3}{2}}\right )^{\frac{2}{3}} \Rightarrow 0\leq u\leq a$.

But what about $v$ ? (Wondering)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi mathmari! (Smile)

What does the region look like?
Can we draw it?
Perhaps we can see then how best to transform it into a triangle. (Thinking)

You current idea for u corresponds more or less with a polar length, which would suggest that v could be an angle. That may not be the most natural fit though, and seems unlikely to lead to an upper bound of $\alpha -u$. (Nerd)
 
I like Serena said:
What does the region look like?
Can we draw it?
Perhaps we can see then how best to transform it into a triangle. (Thinking)

The region is in the following form:

[DESMOS=-5,5,-5,5]x^{\frac{3}{2}}+y^{\frac{3}{2}}\le a^{\frac{3}{2}};a=2[/DESMOS] Do we not have to change only the curve that goes through the points $(0,2)$ and $(2,0)$ to get a triangle? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
The region is in the following form:

Do we not have to change only the curve that goes through the points $(0,2)$ and $(2,0)$ to get a triangle?

Indeed. Hmmm, could we for instance define $u=x$, and try to find a $v$ such that the curve becomes a straight line? (Wondering)
 
I like Serena said:
Indeed. Hmmm, could we for instance define $u=x$, and try to find a $v$ such that the curve becomes a straight line? (Wondering)

Does the curve has to become a straight line that passes through the points $(2,0)$ and $(0,2)$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
Does the curve has to become a straight line that passes through the points $(2,0)$ and $(0,2)$?
That is what I would propose we try.
But there is no 'have to' to it.
 
I like Serena said:
That is what I would propose we try.
But there is no 'have to' to it.

So, does it holds that $v=-u+2$ ? (Wondering)
 
mathmari said:
So, does it holds that $v=-u+2$ ? (Wondering)
That only holds on 1 of the 3 bounding curves (assuming we have $\alpha=2$).
But we can start with that bounding curve, and then try to generalize. (Thinking)
 
I like Serena said:
That only holds on 1 of the 3 bounding curves (assuming we have $\alpha=2$).
But we can start with that bounding curve, and then try to generalize. (Thinking)

Will the triangle be bounded by the lines $v=-x+a$, $u=0$, $v=0$ ? (Wondering)
 
  • #10
mathmari said:
Will the triangle be bounded by the lines $v=-x+a$, $u=0$, $v=0$ ? (Wondering)

Yes.
Now suppose we have a point (x,y) inside D with, say, an $r$ such that $x^{3/2}+y^{3/2}=r^{3/2}$ and $0\le r \le \alpha$,
What would $u$ and $v$ be then in terms of $x$ and $y$? (Wondering)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K