(im)possibility of a two-level laser

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Ameno
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Laser
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of two-level lasers, particularly the assertion that "there cannot be a two-level laser." Participants explore the implications of this statement, questioning the validity of the claim in the context of different pumping mechanisms and the nature of two-level systems.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant notes that in a two-level system, pumping with photons leads to equal rates of absorption and emission, preventing population inversion, which is essential for laser operation.
  • Another participant questions whether two-level lasers can exist if pumped by non-photon methods, such as inelastic collisions, suggesting that this could allow for population inversion.
  • A different viewpoint suggests that if external particles are introduced, the system may no longer be considered a closed two-level system, complicating the original assertion.
  • One participant mentions that inelastic collisions could lead to equilibration of states, raising concerns about the reversibility of processes and the potential for lasing under certain conditions.
  • Another participant references the ammonia maser as an example of a system that operates with two levels, suggesting that similar principles could apply to optical systems.
  • A later reply acknowledges the complexity of the topic, indicating that while diode lasers are often considered two-level lasers, they involve energy bands rather than discrete energy levels, thus complicating the definition of a two-level laser.
  • It is proposed that the statement "there is no optically pumped two-level laser" may be more accurate than the original claim.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity of the statement regarding two-level lasers, with some supporting the idea that alternative pumping methods could allow for lasing, while others maintain that the original assertion holds true under specific conditions. The discussion remains unresolved, with multiple competing perspectives presented.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight limitations in the original claim, particularly regarding the definitions of two-level systems and the conditions under which they operate. The discussion also touches on the implications of introducing external particles and the nature of energy levels versus energy bands.

Ameno
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Hi

I would like to understand the statement that "there cannot be a two-level laser" in a bit more detail.
I understand that given an active medium consisting of two-level systems, one cannot pump it using photons with an energy equal to the energy gap to reach population inversion, because in the stationary state, the rates of absorption and emission are equal (which means that we cannot have pumping and population inversion at the same time). Therefore, there cannot be a two-level laser pumped by photons.

But what about two-level lasers that are pumped in a different way? For instance, isn't a laser diode a two-level laser? I don't see an argument that prevents two-level systems from being pumped by something else than photons (e.g. inelastic collision). Are there such lasers? How far is the statement "there cannot be a two-level laser" still valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Ameno said:
Hi

But what about two-level lasers that are pumped in a different way? For instance, isn't a laser diode a two-level laser? I don't see an argument that prevents two-level systems from being pumped by something else than photons (e.g. inelastic collision). Are there such lasers? How far is the statement "there cannot be a two-level laser" still valid?

Hmm, interesting! Are you talking about non-optically pumped diode lasers in which an external current induces lasing?
But then you are now no more really talking about a closed system. The above statement is strictly true for a radiative closed system. If you bring in particles from outside you are no more talking about two-level systems.

Now if you use inelastic collisions to pump the electrons to upper levels, my guess is the inelastic collisions will work both ways i.e., even excited state particles can collide with the low energy particles which have just lost their energy by collisions and the two rates may equilibrate. Why should reverse process be restricted i.e., process A to B should be same as rate of process B to A. But you are correct that if such a collision process exists, then surely you would have a laser.
For example A to B process could be a chemical reaction in which A to B is an excitation process and the equilibriation rates can be such that B > A.
I wonder if you have looked at chemical lasers? I do not have much idea about those. It maybe possible that they do break the two level rule you talk about.
 
I think most masers like the ammonia maser work with only two levels. The molecules being in the ground state are simply filtered out with a magnetic lens before entering the resonator. I don't see why this shouldn't work in the optical region as well.
 
Sorry for the late answer, and thank you for your replies which confirm my guess that things are somewhat more subtle than claimed by the above statement. For example, I asked a Ph.D. student who is engaged in quantum electronics about the diode laser that I proposed as a counterexample, and he agreed that people often regard a diode laser as a two-level laser, although there are rather energy bands than energy levels, so in this case the question about the existence of a two-level laser is rather a question about the acceptance of the notion.
After all, one should say "there is no optically pumped two-level laser".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
8K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K