A I'm trying to follow the proof given in Box 5.3 of MCP (Thorne/Blandford)

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on a proof from Box 5.3 of the MCP book concerning the Van der Waals grand potential. A participant initially believes there is a missing factor in Equation (8) but is corrected by another member who clarifies that the terms should be (2l)! instead of l!. A high-quality image of the relevant page is provided for reference, although the initial scan was of poor quality. The final line of Equation (8) is confirmed to be correct as presented in the book. The clarification resolves the confusion regarding the proof's accuracy.
jouvelot
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to follow the proof given in Box 5.3, page 235, of the MCP book regarding the Van der Waals grand potential. It seems to me that there is a missing factor (2l−1)!/(l−1)! in the last term of Equation (8). What am I doing wrong?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Can you post a high-quality scan image of that box? Use the "Attach files" link below the edit window to upload the image. Thanks.
 
Thanks @berkeman

Here is the page you requested (the attached version seems to be of rather poor quality). I don't think the previous page is needed, but if you think it could be useful, please let me know.
The original, good quality image is available at https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ep2xqpo5ko9ybdancd33f/20240401_185542.jpg?rlkey=gnsw4ftd8ou2ea8konhgh6mn9&dl=0.

20240401_185542.jpg
 
1711998694491.png


The circled ##l!## terms should each be ##(2l)!##. The final line of (8), as given in the book, is correct.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes jouvelot and berkeman
TSny said:
View attachment 342684

The circled ##l!## terms should each be ##(2l)!##. The final line of (8), as given in the book, is correct.
Ah, this makes a lot of sense, indeed. I was expecting Line 8 to be correct, since the rest of the proof follows through with this value, but couldn't find the error. Thanks a lot, @TSny, for spotting the error before that.
 
I need to calculate the amount of water condensed from a DX cooling coil per hour given the size of the expansion coil (the total condensing surface area), the incoming air temperature, the amount of air flow from the fan, the BTU capacity of the compressor and the incoming air humidity. There are lots of condenser calculators around but they all need the air flow and incoming and outgoing humidity and then give a total volume of condensed water but I need more than that. The size of the...
I was watching a Khan Academy video on entropy called: Reconciling thermodynamic and state definitions of entropy. So in the video it says: Let's say I have a container. And in that container, I have gas particles and they're bouncing around like gas particles tend to do, creating some pressure on the container of a certain volume. And let's say I have n particles. Now, each of these particles could be in x different states. Now, if each of them can be in x different states, how many total...
Thread 'Why work is PdV and not (P+dP)dV in an isothermal process?'
Let's say we have a cylinder of volume V1 with a frictionless movable piston and some gas trapped inside with pressure P1 and temperature T1. On top of the piston lay some small pebbles that add weight and essentially create the pressure P1. Also the system is inside a reservoir of water that keeps its temperature constant at T1. The system is in equilibrium at V1, P1, T1. Now let's say i put another very small pebble on top of the piston (0,00001kg) and after some seconds the system...

Similar threads

Replies
48
Views
11K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
38
Views
46K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Back
Top