I'm trying to follow the proof given in Box 5.3 of MCP (Thorne/Blandford)

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The forum discussion centers on the proof in Box 5.3 of the MCP book by Thorne and Blandford, specifically regarding the Van der Waals grand potential. A user initially questioned a missing factor in Equation (8), but it was clarified that the terms should be (2l)! instead of l!. The final line of Equation (8) is confirmed to be correct. A high-quality scan of the relevant page was also shared to aid understanding.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Van der Waals theory
  • Familiarity with grand potential concepts
  • Knowledge of combinatorial mathematics, specifically factorial notation
  • Access to the MCP book by Thorne and Blandford
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the Van der Waals grand potential in detail
  • Study factorial notation and its applications in physics
  • Examine the proofs presented in the MCP book, focusing on Box 5.3
  • Access high-quality academic resources for better clarity on complex equations
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for physics students, researchers in thermodynamics, and anyone studying the Van der Waals equation and its implications in statistical mechanics.

jouvelot
Messages
51
Reaction score
2
I'm trying to follow the proof given in Box 5.3, page 235, of the MCP book regarding the Van der Waals grand potential. It seems to me that there is a missing factor (2l−1)!/(l−1)! in the last term of Equation (8). What am I doing wrong?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Can you post a high-quality scan image of that box? Use the "Attach files" link below the edit window to upload the image. Thanks.
 
Thanks @berkeman

Here is the page you requested (the attached version seems to be of rather poor quality). I don't think the previous page is needed, but if you think it could be useful, please let me know.
The original, good quality image is available at https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ep2xqpo5ko9ybdancd33f/20240401_185542.jpg?rlkey=gnsw4ftd8ou2ea8konhgh6mn9&dl=0.

20240401_185542.jpg
 
1711998694491.png


The circled ##l!## terms should each be ##(2l)!##. The final line of (8), as given in the book, is correct.
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: jouvelot and berkeman
TSny said:
View attachment 342684

The circled ##l!## terms should each be ##(2l)!##. The final line of (8), as given in the book, is correct.
Ah, this makes a lot of sense, indeed. I was expecting Line 8 to be correct, since the rest of the proof follows through with this value, but couldn't find the error. Thanks a lot, @TSny, for spotting the error before that.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: berkeman

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
29K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
46K