I am writing my senior thesis (I am an undergrad math major at UCSB) on Dirichlet Series, which are, in the classical sense, series of the form(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

[tex]\zeta (s)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_k}{k^s}[/tex]

where [tex]a_k,s\in\mathbb{C}[/tex] and are more generally given by (whence the name generalized Dirichlet series)

[tex]\xi (s)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_k e^{-\lambda_k s}[/tex]

where [tex]\{ \lambda_k\}[/tex] is a sequence of real numbers such that [tex]\lambda_k < \lambda_{k+1},\forall k\in\mathbb{Z} ^+[/tex] and such that [tex]\lambda_k\rightarrow\infty\mbox{ as }k\rightarrow\infty .[/tex] I note that the usual power series and classical Dirichlet series are both special cases of generalized Dirichlet series (the sufficiently curious will check this by putting [tex]\lambda_k = \log k[/tex] in [tex]\xi[/tex] to obtain the later, and put [tex] a_k = b_n[/tex] if [tex]k=2^{n}[/tex] and [tex]a_n = 0[/tex] otherwise in [tex]\zeta[/tex] to obtain the former.)

As is well known, the formula for multipling two absolutely convergent classical Dirichlet series, say f and g given by

[tex]f(s)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_k}{k^s}\mbox{ and }g(s)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{b_n}{n^s},[/tex]

is theso-calledDirichlet product or convolution given by

[tex]h(s):=f(s)g(s)=\left( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}\frac{a_k}{k^s}\right) \left( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty}\frac{b_n}{n^s}\right) = \sum_{k=1}^{\infty} \left( \sum_{n|k}a_{n}b_{\frac{k}{n}}\right) \frac{1}{k^s} ,[/tex]

where the inner sum is over all positive divisors n of k (the symbol n|k is read "n divides k".) This is an analog of the Cauchy product of power series, namely

[tex]\left( \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}a_{k}z^{k}\right) \left( \sum_{n=0}^{\infty}b_{n}z^{n}\right) = \sum_{k=0}^{\infty} \left( \sum_{n=0}^{k}a_{n}b_{k-n}\right) z^{k} .[/tex]

I am attempting to formulate an analog of this multiplication formula for generalized Dirichlet series, this is what I've got:

Question: is the following correct?

The formula for multipling two absolutely convergent general Dirichlet series, say F and G given by

[tex]F(s)=\sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}e^{-\alpha_k s}\mbox{ and }G(s)=\sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_{n}e^{-\beta_n s},[/tex]

is

[tex]H(s):=F(s)G(s)=\left( \sum_{k=1}^{\infty}a_{k}e^{-\alpha_k s}\right) \left( \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} b_{n}e^{-\beta_n s}\right) = \sum_{k=2}^{\infty} \left( \sum_{\substack{p+q=k\\p,q\geq 1}}a_{p}b_{q}e^{-\left(\alpha_p + \beta_q \right) s}\right) ,[/tex]

where the inner sum is over all integer partitions of k into exactly two summands p and q.

Note that this should reduce to the Dirichlet product and/or the Cauchy product under the respective special cases mentioned above.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I'm writing my senior thesis on Dirichlet Series

Loading...

Similar Threads for writing senior thesis | Date |
---|---|

Writing correct mathematics -- functions within functions... | Jul 22, 2015 |

Is it possible to re-write this expression? | May 14, 2015 |

Why can you write a= dv/dt as a*dt = dv? and what does it mean? | Nov 11, 2014 |

Can I write this integral in "closed-form" expression? | Aug 6, 2014 |

I'm having trouble with an integral for my QM senior thesis | Aug 1, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**