MHB Imaginary numbers and real numbers?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on finding the possible values of the complex number z that satisfy the equations z^12=1 and z^20=1. It is established that z can be either a real, imaginary, or complex number, with the known solutions being 1, -1, i, and -i. By manipulating the equations, it is shown that z^8-1=0 leads to the factors (z^4-1)(z^4+1)=0, and further factoring reveals that z^4=-1 does not satisfy the original equations. Ultimately, the complete set of solutions is confirmed to be z in the set {-i, +i, -1, 1}. The analysis concludes that these four values are the only solutions to the given equations.
Ilikebugs
Messages
94
Reaction score
0
z is either a real, imaginary or complex number, and z^12=1 and z^20 also equals 1. What are all possible values of z?

I know 1 and -1 are them, and I think its also i and -i?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
We have:

$$z^{12}=1=z^{20}$$

We know $z\ne0$ so we may divide through by $z^{12}$ to get:

$$z^8-1=0$$

$$\left(z^4-1\right)\left(z^4+1\right)=0$$

Now, we observe that $z^4=-1$ satisfies neither original equation, so we are left with:

$$\left(z^4-1\right)=0$$

Next, factor as the difference of squares:

$$\left(z^2+1\right)\left(z^2-1\right)=0$$

Since $1=-(-1)=-i^2$, we may write:

$$\left(z^2-i^2\right)\left(z^2-1\right)=0$$

Factor again:

$$(z+i)(z-i)(z+1)(z-1)=0$$

Thus, $z\in\{-i,+i,-1,1\}$, as you thought. :D
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top