Why are imaginary numbers called "imaginary"? If they really exist

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the terminology of "imaginary numbers," exploring the reasons behind this nomenclature despite their real applications in mathematics and physics. Participants delve into historical context, definitions, and the implications of using the term "imaginary" in various mathematical frameworks.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Historical
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that imaginary numbers are called "imaginary" due to historical skepticism from mathematicians, particularly René Descartes, who coined the term in 1637.
  • Others discuss the mathematical definitions of complex numbers and how imaginary numbers fit within that framework, suggesting that they are simply a subset of complex numbers.
  • One participant highlights the distinction between real and imaginary numbers in physics, noting that while complex numbers are used mathematically, measurable quantities are always real.
  • Another viewpoint emphasizes the idea that the term "imaginary" reflects the initial perception of these numbers as mere constructs or solutions to equations, rather than tangible entities.
  • Some participants express confusion about the existence of imaginary numbers and the implications of their usefulness, questioning the meaning of "existence" in this context.
  • A later reply challenges speculative interpretations of the term "imaginary," insisting on the importance of historical accuracy regarding Descartes' use of the term.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the term "imaginary" has historical roots and that it reflects a certain skepticism from early mathematicians. However, there is disagreement regarding the implications of this terminology and the interpretation of its significance in modern mathematics and physics.

Contextual Notes

Some discussions reveal limitations in understanding the term "imaginary," particularly regarding the definitions of existence and usefulness in mathematical contexts. The historical context of the term's origin is also noted as a point of contention.

SHASHWAT PRATAP SING
Messages
119
Reaction score
13
If Imaginary numbers do exist and have real applications, then why do we call imaginary numbers "imaginary numbers"? . They exist. They're used all the time. What makes them "imaginary"?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You're right! You can look at how Spivak defines complex numbers, as a pair ##(a,b)## along with the definitions ##(a,b) + (a,d) = (a+c, b+d)## and ##(a,b) \cdot (c,d) = (a\cdot c - b\cdot d, a\cdot d + b \cdot c)##. The ##x+iy## notation is recovered by setting ##i = (0,1)##, and ##(a,0) = a##. There's nothing very strange about this at all. And imaginary numbers are just a subset of ##\mathbb{C}##, of the form ##(0,b)##.

Historically, mathematicians have a tendency to be skeptical about new developments, hence why "imaginary" was introduced as a bit of a diss.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
If Imaginary numbers do exist and have real applications, then why do we call imaginary numbers "imaginary numbers"? . They exist. They're used all the time. What makes them "imaginary"?
The name originally was due to skepticism and has stuck. There is, however, an important distinction between real and complex/imaginary numbers in physics. Complex numbers tend to be part of the mathematical machinery, but measurements are always real numbers. You can measure an angle ##\theta##, but you can't do a measurement and get an imaginary angle ##i\theta##.

This is hard-wired into Quantum Mechanics, where measurements are the eigenvalues of Hermitian operators - and these operators always have real eigenvalues. There are other important operators in QM that have complex or imaginary eigenvalues, but these explicitly are not measurable quantities.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: etotheipi
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
If Imaginary numbers do exist and have real applications, then why do we call imaginary numbers "imaginary numbers"? . They exist. They're used all the time. What makes them "imaginary"?
Not what, whom! It was René Descartes 1637. The reason was very likely, that the complex zeros of polynomials, for which the imaginary numbers were first needed, couldn't be seen in their graphs.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FactChecker, berkeman and aheight
What i have understood is that imaginary numbers are called imaginary because Mathematicians thought up an answer to the square root of -1, and they simply "imagined" a solution. Later when it was found that Imaginary numbers really exist,The name was not changed beause the named sound impressive as by "IMAGINARY NUMBERS" it was left to us to imagine a solution to the square root of negative numbers aince we are imagining the number so it got its name "Imaginary Numbers".

Here comes an important point- IMAGINARY NUMBERS are Imaginary but their existence is not Imaginary they really exist. it was imaginary in the sense as it was left to the people's imagination to imagine a solution to the square root of negative numbers and use the letter i this was fancy and impressive.
So,IMAGINARY NUMBERS are Imaginary but their existence is not Imaginary.they are "imaginary" but not in the sense of fantasy or fiction.It is just the same word being used differently...

Please tell me have I understood it correctly...
 
You will need to explain what you mean when you say a "real" number "exists". I think this is fraught.
I prefer a more teleological approach: is the concept useful? Of course then one needs to define "useful"
 
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
Please tell me have I understood it correctly...
You did not. The correct version is in my post #4. Descartes used it 1637 for the first time. Mathematicians at this point in time were still busy to solve polynomial equations. Imaginary numbers occurred in the formulas of Italian mathematicians like Cardano, Tartaglia or Ferrari a century ago. Descartes, however, coined the name imaginary. If you want to know his thoughts, you have to dig up the original article, likely a letter.

It is not helpful to fantasize some speculative explanations if history is as clear as in this case.
 
fresh_42 said:
Descartes, however, coined the name imaginary.

My question is not how , its why did he coined the name Imaginary if these numbers really exists.Help me.

hutchphd said:
I prefer a more teleological approach: is the concept useful? Of course then one needs to define "useful
please help me i am confused i want to know why were these numbers called imaginary
 
SHASHWAT PRATAP SING said:
My question is not how , its why did he coined the name Imaginary if these numbers really exists.Help me.
Look up Helmuth Gericke: Geschichte des Zahlbegriffs. Bibliographisches Institut, Mannheim 1970, p. 66. and the references therein.

Again, and for the third time: If you want to know why Descartes named it so, you will have to read the original occurrence.

The question has been answered. Speculations are meaningless, so this thread will be closed.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Discourse_on_the_Method
https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b86069594/f5.image
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: robphy

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
8K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
5K
  • · Replies 64 ·
3
Replies
64
Views
8K