Implementing angular momentum approach in problem

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
RoboNerd
Messages
410
Reaction score
11

Homework Statement


An object is in uniform circular horizontal motion at the end of a chord of length L. Its tangential speed is v. The chord is pulled into length 0.5L in such a way that the tension in the chord remains constant. As a result, the tangential speed:

a) remains constant
b) increases to 2v
c) decreases to 0.5v
d) increases to 1.4v
e) decreases to 0.7v

Homework Equations


The correct answer is E.
This can be solved using T = m * v^2/r approach. I get this, and I know how this works.

The Attempt at a Solution


Here's what I though initially: we do not have any net torques on the system [using an analogy of planetary motion around the sun, where angular momentum is conserved, substituting Tension force for gravitational force], so angular momentum has to be conserved.

Thus:

Li = Lf
[m*v*r]i = [m*v*r]f

I eliminate the m's, and then plug:
v*L = x * 0.5 L
thus x = 2v, which is b, an incorrect answer.

Could anyone please explain why this approach is incorrect?

Thanks in advance for the assistance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
RoboNerd said:
Could anyone please explain why this approach is incorrect?

Thanks in advance for the assistance!

If the tension in the chord doesn't change, why would the object move in?

Try to imagine actually carrying out this experiment.
 
PeroK said:
If the tension in the chord doesn't change, why would the object move in?

Object moves in because it slows down?
 
RoboNerd said:
Object moves in because it slows down?

So, someone would have to slow it down in this experiment. If they didn't, the tension would necessarily increase.

This is another slighly disengenuous question, where you are being caught out by what is not said in the question!
 
PeroK said:
This is another slighly disengenuous question, where you are being caught out by what is not said in the question!
The authors write really crummy questions. I have been dealing with them for the past 1.5 days now :-/
 
RoboNerd said:
The authors write really crummy questions. I have been dealing with them for the past 1.5 days now :-/

Personally, I don't like this sort of question. But, perhaps it's good not to assume that everything is in the question. Or, at least to analyse the question more. My initial thought was: that's not right, the tension must increase to pull the object in. Then I realized what was intended.