Implementing Kramers–Kronig causality check on real VNA s-params

  • Thread starter Thread starter yefj
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 132 views
yefj
Messages
124
Reaction score
2
Hello , Kramers–Kronig need infinite BW but I measure s-params from 0 to 70GHZ.
how do you reccomend to deal with the missing data?
Thanks.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
To work perfectly, Kramers-Kronig requires a bandwidth from DC to daylight, but perfection is impossible, so you must settle for less.

The same is true in time domain reflectometry, TDR, where the incident step must be instant and the sampling rate infinite. For that you must buy a more expensive storage oscilloscope, say, with a BW of 100 GHz and a sampling rate of 240 Gss.

The advantage of time domain reflectometry, is that you do not need an IFFT or an integration, but TDR still has the bandwidth problem of Gibb's Effect, which breaks causality by appearing before the step.