Implicit Differentiation and Complex numbers concept question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the application of implicit differentiation to the equation of a circle and the implications of extending this to complex numbers. Participants explore the validity of computing derivatives for complex values of x, particularly when x exceeds the radius of the circle.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about computing the derivative of the circle function for x > 1, questioning if complex derivatives can be derived in this case.
  • Another participant suggests using different variables to clarify the situation, indicating that the derivative can be computed with complex numbers.
  • A different viewpoint argues that the circle is not defined for x > 1, as it lies outside the radius of the circle.
  • Some participants discuss the concept of extending the circle into the complex plane, suggesting that complex derivatives may still hold value.
  • One participant questions the behavior of the derivative when plotted with complex numbers, noting a discrepancy between expected and observed slopes.
  • Another participant explains that the derivative in the complex context is multi-valued and does not represent a traditional slope but rather a more complex relationship.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the validity and utility of computing derivatives for complex values of x. Some agree that complex derivatives can be computed, while others maintain that the circle's definition limits the applicability of these derivatives to real values.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of understanding the multi-valued nature of complex functions and derivatives, which may not align with traditional interpretations of slopes in real-valued contexts.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students learning implicit differentiation, complex analysis, and those exploring the intersections of real and complex mathematics.

DrummingAtom
Messages
657
Reaction score
2
I just started learning Implicit Differentiation and came across an issue. I took the derivative of the circle function:

y2 + x2 = 1

y' = -x / y

This all made sense until I solved the circle function for y, which gives:

y = [tex]\pm[/tex][tex]\sqrt{1 - x^2}[/tex]

For any x > 1, it's going to be complex. So, does this mean that for any x > 1 I can now compute the derivative for those complex numbers? Because plugging a x > 1 into my derivative formula I'll get a number. Any help is appreciated, thanks.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi DrummingAtom! :wink:

Let's use different letters, to make it easier …

if z2 + t2 = 1, with t real and z complex,

then dz/dt = -t/z, and everything's ok :smile:

(try it with z = x + iy if you're not happy)
 
I don't know if I'm right... But as I see it, circle is not defined for any x > 1 since radius of this circle is 1. At a point x > 1 there is no circle so I don't think it's of any use..
 
Welcome to PF!

Hi Wzet! Welcome to PF! :smile:

Yes, the curve doesn't go into the x > 1 region, if we allow an ordinary (real) y-axis.

But if we allow a "complex y-axis", the curve y = √(1 - x2) carries on up to "infinite" x.
 
Thanks for welcoming :)

I thought the question was, if it helpful and if the computation of derivative when x > 1 tells us something. if x < 1 then we can compute useful things, but is the complex derivative of the function helpful?
 
Wzet said:
… is the complex derivative of the function helpful?

sometimes :smile:

(one of the advantages of complex functions is that they do most of the things that real functions do … only more so! :biggrin:)
 
DrummingAtom said:
I just started learning Implicit Differentiation and came across an issue. I took the derivative of the circle function:

y2 + x2 = 1

y' = -x / y

This all made sense until I solved the circle function for y, which gives:

y = [tex]\pm[/tex][tex]\sqrt{1 - x^2}[/tex]

For any x > 1, it's going to be complex. So, does this mean that for any x > 1 I can now compute the derivative for those complex numbers? Because plugging a x > 1 into my derivative formula I'll get a number. Any help is appreciated, thanks.
If x> 1, then (x, y) is not on the circle so your equation is invalid.
 
I need to clarify my question more. I'm new to complex numbers and have only done very basic things with them, so bear with me.

After plotting some complex number points of the function [tex]t =<br /> \sqrt{1 - z^2}[/tex]

It appears to have positive slope, but according to the dz/dt = -t/z, it should be negative. How is this working? Thanks.
 
Hi DrummingAtom! :smile:

I'm not sure what you've drawn,

but if t is real, and if z is "positive" imaginary (z = iy), then 1/z is "negative" imaginary (z = -i/y), and -t/z is "positive" imaginary.

Does that help?​
 
  • #10
DrummingAtom said:
I just started learning Implicit Differentiation and came across an issue. I took the derivative of the circle function:

y2 + x2 = 1

y' = -x / y

This all made sense until I solved the circle function for y, which gives:

y = [tex]\pm[/tex][tex]\sqrt{1 - x^2}[/tex]

For any x > 1, it's going to be complex. So, does this mean that for any x > 1 I can now compute the derivative for those complex numbers? Because plugging a x > 1 into my derivative formula I'll get a number. Any help is appreciated, thanks.

Yes, except the derivative does not exist at [itex]\pm 1[/itex]. The circle is only a small part of the more global complex function. To see that, write it as:

[tex]w^2+z^2=1[/tex]

and treat w and z as complex numbers. We can solve for w:

[tex]w=\sqrt{1-z^2}[/tex]

where it is now understood the square root is multi-valued and now represents an object in complex space. The "real" circle we represent as [itex]x^2+y^2=1[/tex] is only the set of points on this "complex" object when w and z are real and satisfy the expession. <br /> <br /> Now, that complex object has a (multi) derivative everywhere except at [itex]z=\pm 1[/itex]<br /> <br /> <br /> For example:<br /> <br /> [tex]\frac{dw}{dz}\biggr|_{z=-2}=-\frac{z}{\sqrt{1-z^2}}\biggr|_{z=-2}=\frac{2}{\sqrt{-3}}=\frac{2}{\pm i \sqrt{3}}=\pm i\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}[/tex].<br /> <br /> That is now a "complex" derivative and since the function was multivalued, so too is it's derivative. However, this derivative of a complex function no longer represents a "slope" of a curve but rather something more applicable to complex numbers.<br /> <br /> Here's your circle dude: See it right? In there. That figure is the real part of the "complex object" I was referring to.[/itex]
 

Attachments

  • mycircle.jpg
    mycircle.jpg
    34.2 KB · Views: 492
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K