What is the Solution to Implicit Differentiation Homework with Given Values?

Click For Summary
To solve the implicit differentiation problem involving the equation 1/a = 1/b + 1/c, it is essential to differentiate both sides with respect to time t, treating a, b, and c as functions of t. The correct approach involves applying the chain rule to relate the derivatives da/dt, db/dt, and dc/dt. The discussion clarifies that one can express da/dt in terms of dc/dt by substituting the known values of a and b into the original equation to find c. The final solution hinges on correctly applying these differentiation techniques, which are fundamental in calculus. Understanding these methods allows for accurate computation of the required derivative.
jisbon
Messages
475
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
Let ##\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}##
If ##\frac{db}{dt}=0.2## ,## \frac{dc}{dt}=0.3## , Find ##\frac{da}{dt}## when a=80 , b=100
Relevant Equations
-
Homework Statement: Let ##\frac{1}{a}=\frac{1}{b}+\frac{1}{c}##
If ##\frac{db}{dt}=0.2## ,## \frac{dc}{dt}=0.3## , Find ##\frac{da}{dt}## when a=80 , b=100
Homework Equations: -

Since we are supposed to find ##\frac{da}{dt}##, I can deduce that:
## \frac{da}{dt} =\frac{da}{dc}\cdot\frac{dc}{dt} = (\frac{db}{dc}\cdot\frac{da}{db})\cdot\frac{dc}{dt} =((\frac{db}{dt}\cdot\frac{dt}{dc})\cdot\frac{da}{db})\cdot\frac{dc}{dt} = ((\frac{0.2}{0.3}\cdot\frac{da}{db})\cdot0.3## = Answer?

To find ##\frac{da}{db}##, I need to differentiate implicitly, which gives me ##\frac{da}{db}##=1 ? (Not sure if it's correct), hence the answer is 1*0.2/0.3*0.3?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
jisbon said:
I need to differentiate implicitly, which gives me ##\frac{da}{db}##=1 ? (Not sure if it's correct)
No, that's not correct. Differentiate both sides of the original equation with respect to t, not b. Assume that each of a, b, c is a function of t. You will get an equation with the three derivatives wrt t in it, and the three amounts a, b, c. Making the above numeric substitutions you will get an equation that relates ##\frac{da}{dt}## to c. You can rearrange that to express ##\frac{da}{dt}## in terms of c, which is what I presume they want you to do.
 
  • Like
Likes jisbon
in addition to what @andrewkirk says, you can also find c when a=80,b=100 by using the original equation.
 
  • Like
Likes jisbon
andrewkirk said:
No, that's not correct. Differentiate both sides of the original equation with respect to t, not b. Assume that each of a, b, c is a function of t. You will get an equation with the three derivatives wrt t in it, and the three amounts a, b, c. Making the above numeric substitutions you will get an equation that relates ##\frac{da}{dt}## to c. You can rearrange that to express ##\frac{da}{dt}## in terms of c, which is what I presume they want you to do.
Delta2 said:
in addition to what @andrewkirk says, you can also find c when a=80,b=100 by using the original equation.
Will it be something like: ##\frac{-1}{a^2}\frac{da}{dt}=\frac{-1}{b^2}\frac{db}{dt}+\frac{-1}{c^2}\frac{dc}{dt}##?
 
Oh ok. Then I guess I could solve the question easily now. Thanks for the clarification :smile:
 
It is often seen as an application of the chain rule as others said. First equation sets up a as a function of b,c and it is assumed both b,c are functions of t. Then we apply the total derivative which uses the chain rule ,i.e, we have a=a(b(t),c(t)) and we go from there to define da/dt.
 
WWGD said:
It is often seen as an application of the chain rule as others said. First equation sets up a as a function of b,c and it is assumed both b,c are functions of t. Then we apply the total derivative which uses the chain rule ,i.e, we have a=a(b(t),c(t)) and we go from there to define da/dt.
Or more simply, without using the total derivative...
Since a is a function of b and c, with b and c being functions of t, then a is also a function of t.
Just differentiate all with respect to t using the chain rule, exactly as @jisbon shows in post #4.
 
Mark44 said:
Or more simply, without using the total derivative...
Since a is a function of b and c, with b and c being functions of t, then a is also a function of t.
Just differentiate all with respect to t using the chain rule, exactly as @jisbon shows in post #4.
I don't know of any setup for chain rule using two variables that does not use the total derivative. I have seen, of course, for one variable but not for two or more. But I guess it comes down to the same in the end.
 
  • #10
WWGD said:
I don't know of any setup for chain rule using two variables that does not use the total derivative. I have seen, of course, for one variable but not for two or more.
You don't need to treat a as a function of two variables; i.e., a = f(b, c).
All you need is to treat a, b, and c as implicit functions of t, and then differentiate implicitly, as hinted at in the title of this thread. IOW, you can interpret the original equation to mean ##\frac 1 {a(t)} = \frac 1 {b(t)} + \frac 1 {c(t)}##.

BTW, this is standard fare in first quarter/first semester calculus, usually presented before any discussion of the total derivative.
 
  • #11
Well, now the OP knows two techniques and can choose which one to apply. I get to decide since i have 4444 messages, using 44 twice--- not just once;).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K