A Importance of Densities in QFT

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter physwiz222
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the possibility of describing Quantum Fields in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) using charge and particle densities, similar to how electron density is treated in Quantum Mechanics. It raises the question of whether a Particle/Charge Density Operator exists in QFT that could provide expectation values for charge or particle density, particularly for vacuum or single-particle states. The conversation notes that while methods like Density Functional Theory are common in Quantum Chemistry, such calculations seem rare in QFT, especially for interacting fields due to complexity. The importance of studying charge and particle densities is emphasized as a means to visualize the vacuum state and particle emergence from fields, despite the non-classical nature of Quantum Fields. Ultimately, the discussion seeks clarity on the feasibility of representing Quantum Fields through charge or particle number density in a tangible way.
physwiz222
Messages
79
Reaction score
9
TL;DR
I wonder if there is a way to find charge and particle number densities of Quantum Fields like in regular QM
I have been looking at QFT out of curiosity so I am not an expert. In standard Quantum Mechanics you have something called the Charge or Electron density where you essentially describe a many particle wavefunction in terms of 3 coordinates by integrating the coordinates of all the electrons except for one and repeat for every electron giving you the Total Electron Density as a function of 3 coordinates. In fact many methods in Quantum Chemistry like Density Functional Theory seek to calculate this.

Is a similar thing possible in QFT as the wavefunction in QFT is a wavefunctional an infinite dimensional functional of field configurations but we live in 3 dimensions so is it possible to describe the Quantum Fields in terms of charge and particle densities at least via the Operator Formalism like is there a Particle/Charge Density Operator in QFT which you can take the expectation value of to get the charge or particle density of say the vacuum or the 1 particle state and visualize that.

Also it seems no one ever calculates charge and particle densities in QFT if there is such an operator at least for free fields its probably horribly intractable for interacting fields (from what I know we dont even have a way to describe finite time dynamics of interacting fields at least with the S Matrix and Feynman Diagrams so computing densities for this is out of the question).

With that in mind why is it never calculated for free fields isnt the charge density or Particle Density of Quantum Fields an Important thing to study as it provides a 3 dimensional tangible picture of for example the Vacuum State. I know QFT courses have to focus on Feynman Diagrams and the S Matrix but why cant we also find charge and particle densities of Free Fields at least to visualize the Vacuum and particle states in a more concrete spatial way to see how particles emerge from Fields.

Keep in mind I am not asking for a classical realist picture of electron trajectories. I want a 3 dimensional tangible non classical picture of charge and energy density. I know Quantum Fields arent like classical fields I just want to know if it possible to describe them using charge or particle number density.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The charge-current and the energy-momentum tensor (containing the energy and momentum density) are described by local field operators. Eg., for the free Dirac field the charge four-current is given by
$$\hat{j}^{\mu}(x)=q :\hat{\bar{\psi}}(x) \gamma^{\mu} \hat{\psi}(x):.$$
 
  • Like
Likes Demystifier and topsquark
We often see discussions about what QM and QFT mean, but hardly anything on just how fundamental they are to much of physics. To rectify that, see the following; https://www.cambridge.org/engage/api-gateway/coe/assets/orp/resource/item/66a6a6005101a2ffa86cdd48/original/a-derivation-of-maxwell-s-equations-from-first-principles.pdf 'Somewhat magically, if one then applies local gauge invariance to the Dirac Lagrangian, a field appears, and from this field it is possible to derive Maxwell’s...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
134
Views
10K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
422
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
3K