Importing entire script instead of function

  • Context: Python 
  • Thread starter Thread starter member 428835
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of Python imports, specifically why importing a function from a script also executes the entire script instead of just the function. Participants explore the implications of top-level code execution and the use of the `if __name__ == '__main__':` construct in Python scripts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants confirm that importing a module executes all top-level code, including function definitions and any statements present.
  • Others suggest that using `if __name__ == '__main__':` can prevent certain code from running when the module is imported, allowing for better control over execution.
  • A participant proposes that the execution of top-level code is necessary to ensure that any imports within that code are available when the functions are called.
  • Some participants discuss the practice of separating driver code from function definitions to avoid unintended execution when importing modules.
  • There is mention of the trade-offs between having a module that can be run as a script versus one that is solely for importation.
  • A participant shares their experience of renaming and restructuring their script to achieve the desired import behavior.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the mechanics of how Python imports work, but there is no consensus on the best practices for structuring scripts to manage execution behavior. Different preferences for organizing code are expressed, indicating a variety of approaches to the issue.

Contextual Notes

Some participants note that while it is common to use the `if __name__ == '__main__':` construct, there are scenarios where top-level code is necessary. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding the implications of code organization in Python modules.

Who May Find This Useful

Programmers and developers working with Python who are interested in module design, import behavior, and best practices for structuring scripts.

member 428835
Hello

I have a script a13_roman2num.py that reads
Python:
def value(r):

    if (r == 'I'):
        return 1
    if (r == 'V'):
        return 5
    if (r == 'X'):
        return 10
    if (r == 'L'):
        return 50
    if (r == 'C'):
        return 100
    if (r == 'D'):
        return 500
    if (r == 'M'):
        return 1000
    return

def romanToDecimal(str):
    i   = 0;
    res = 0;

    while i < len(str):
        if i + 1 < len(str):
            if value(str[i]) < value(str[i+1]):
                res += value(str[i+1]) - value(str[i])
                i += 2
            else:
                res += value(str[i])
                i += 1
        else:
            res += value(str[i])
            i += 1

    return res

# DRIVER CODE
str = "MCMIV"
print(romanToDecimal(str))

and another script a12.py that runs
Python:
from a13_roman2num import value

For some reason when I run a12.py the output prints 1904. Why is a12.py running the entire script a13_roman2num.py instead of just importing the function I'm asking for?

Thanks so much!
 
Technology news on Phys.org
This is a good question. I confirm the same behavior you see. I would not have expected it to do that. If you put the 3 statements at the end inside a function, like main() for example, then it doesn't do that. I guess it has to do with the details of how the import function works. This link gives some details, but doesn't really answer your question.
https://docs.python.org/3/reference/import.html
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
jedishrfu said:
Isn’t that why programmers use the

Code:
    if __name__ == ‘__main__’:
        print(…)

coding scheme to prevent the code outside all functions in a13 from runnning?

https://www.freecodecamp.org/news/if-name-main-python-example/
Okay, this makes sense. But does this mean every time I write a script I need to have
Code:
    if __name__ == ‘__main__’:
        print(…)
preceding all executions to ensure if I'm calling on a function from that script I don't import the executions as well?
 
Maybe the answer is that it needs to run the code outside of the functions in order to bring in any imports you have. For example, if you have:
Python:
import numpy as np

def Sqrt(x):
    return np.sqrt(x)

And you then want to import the function Sqrt() into another python script, you would expect it to run the import statement or else the Sqrt() function won't work. So it may be set up to run anything outside of def statements when it does the import.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
joshmccraney said:
For some reason when I run a12.py the output prints 1904. Why is a12.py running the entire script a13_roman2num.py instead of just importing the function I'm asking for?
What's the full text of a12.py? All you showed was just the import statement.
 
joshmccraney said:
Why is a12.py running the entire script a13_roman2num.py instead of just importing the function I'm asking for?
Because when you import a module, which is what your Python file that includes the value function is, all of the code in that module gets executed. Note that this includes function definitions: function definitions are executed at runtime in Python. So even if the only code your module included was function definitions, all of them would get executed when you imported the module, not just the value function that you want to use.

However, your module does not just include function definitions. It also includes statements. Those statements will get executed every time you import the module. If you don't want that, you need to use the if __name__ == '__main__' idiom that @jedishrfu referred to.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
phyzguy said:
Maybe the answer is that it needs to run the code outside of the functions in order to bring in any imports you have.
The answer is that when you import a module in Python, all of the code in that module runs, as I said in post #7. That is how Python works.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phyzguy
Mark44 said:
What's the full text of a12.py? All you showed was just the import statement.
Wouldn't matter. The import statement alone is sufficient to produce the observed behavior.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
  • #10
joshmccraney said:
But does this mean every time I write a script I need to have
Code:
    if __name__ == ‘__main__’:
        print(…)
preceding all executions to ensure if I'm calling on a function from that script I don't import the executions as well?
It is a good general practice to not have any top-level code (i.e., code not inside a function or class definition) in a module (and every script is a module), other than import statements. So yes, it is good practice to put any top-level code inside an if __name__ == '__main__' block. There are cases where you do need to have top-level code inside a module and not in such a block, but they are rare.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
  • #11
We often use the trick to add test code to a script that is only run when the script is invoked directly. When imported the test code is skipped.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835
  • #12
Just to reiterate what others have said, imagine a module
Python:
# Module foo.py
def x():
    return y()
def y()
    return "y"
If the python developers had tried to implement from foo import x as only compiling the function x then a call to x() wouldn't work because it wouldn't have heard of y.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: phyzguy
  • #13
Or if your a13_roman2num.py code enclosed the driver code in a function definition, then importing it would only define the function, rather than executing the driver code.
 
  • #14
Here's what works for me.

I changed the name of a13_roman2num.py to mccraney_module.py. I also removed the driver code from it.

I placed the driver code in a script named mccraney_main.py:
Python:
from mccraney_module import romanToDecimal

str = "MCMIV"
print(romanToDecimal(str))
Output is 1904

If I add this line to code immediately above...
Python:
print(value(str[0]))
...
I get "NameError: name "value" is not defined."
This shows that only the label romanToDecimal is being imported, which is what you would expect from the import statement.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 428835 and jim mcnamara
  • #15
Thank you all for the detailed explanations. I have a much better idea what is going on.
 
  • #16
Mark44 said:
This shows that only the label romanToDecimal is being imported
Only that name is imported into the namespace of the module "mcraney_main.py". But note that all of the function definitions in "a13_roman2num.py" are still executed by the interpreter and are still in the namespace of the module "a13_roman2num.py" (as you can verify by looking up that module in sys.modules and seeing what attributes it has).
 
  • #17
Mark44 said:
Here's what works for me.
The same thing could be accomplished, as has already been mentioned, by putting the "driver code" in "a13_roman2num.py" in an if __name__ == '__main__' block. Which solution is preferred would depend on the specific use case: do you want to be able to run "a13_roman2num.py" itself as a script, or is it OK to have the "driver code" in a separate script and have "a13_roman2num.py" only be useful as an imported module?
 
  • #18
PeterDonis said:
The same thing could be accomplished, as has already been mentioned, by putting the "driver code" in "a13_roman2num.py" in an if __name__ == '__main__' block. Which solution is preferred would depend on the specific use case: do you want to be able to run "a13_roman2num.py" itself as a script, or is it OK to have the "driver code" in a separate script and have "a13_roman2num.py" only be useful as an imported module?
My preference would be to separate out the functions and possibly initialization code into modules that are imported into other scripts, but not run on their own.
 
  • #19
Mark44 said:
My preference would be to separate out the functions and possibly initialization code into modules that are imported into other scripts, but not run on their own.
Yes, and that's a common pattern. But there are use cases where it makes sense to have a module be both runnable as a script and importable by other modules. (The Python interpreter has the -m switch to make it easy to run modules as scripts for this reason.)
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
55
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 97 ·
4
Replies
97
Views
9K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K