Improper Integral Convergence: Find Value of 0 to Infinity (Xe-x)dX

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The improper integral from 0 to infinity of (Xe-x)dX converges to 1, contrary to initial assumptions that it converges to zero. The correct evaluation involves integration by parts, leading to the limit of the expression as b approaches infinity, which simplifies to 1. The terms -b e-b and e-b approach zero, confirming the convergence of the integral.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Familiarity with integration by parts
  • Knowledge of limits and L'Hôpital's rule
  • Basic proficiency in LaTeX for mathematical expressions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the method of integration by parts in detail
  • Learn about improper integrals and their convergence criteria
  • Explore L'Hôpital's rule for evaluating limits involving indeterminate forms
  • Practice writing mathematical expressions using LaTeX
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in mastering improper integrals and their convergence properties.

lcam2
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Find if the improper integral converges or diverges; If converges find its exact value.

Integral from 0 to infinity of (Xe-x)dX

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Using limit properties, i found that the integral was zero.
Does it make sense that the integral converges to zero?? I don't understand.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lcam2 said:

Homework Statement


Find if the improper integral converges or diverges; If converges find its exact value.

Integral from 0 to infinity of (Xe-x)dX

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


Using limit properties, i found that the integral was zero.
Does it make sense that the integral converges to zero?? I don't understand.

No, the integral doesn't converge to zero. Show us what you did and we can steer you in the right direction.
 
If you mean that
\lim_{x \to \infty} x e^{-x} = 0
then yes. But that does not mean that
\int_0^\infty x e^{-x} \, dx = 0
In fact it is not, because x e^{-x} \not\equiv 0.

Try integration by parts?
 
0∫∞(xe^(x ))dx This is the original promblem

And this is what i did
0∫∞(xe^(x ))dx = lim┬(b→∞) 0∫b(xe^x )dx =lim┬(b→∞) (-be^(-b)-e^(-b) )= lim┬(b→∞) (-b)/e^b =0
 
You forgot the lower boundaries in your partial integration. You get
\lim_{b \to 0} \left. (-x e^{-x} - e^{-x} \right|_{x = 0}^\infty
which is
(-b e^{-b} + 0 e^{-0}) - (e^{-b} - e^{-0})
 
Ok, i see.
Now evaluating the lower limits my new limit is

lim(b→∞) (-b=1)/(e^b)+1

separating the limits and using l'hospital's, my new limits is 1
Is that correct?? Can i separate the limits?? I am not sure if i can do that.
Thanks for all the help
 
lcam2 said:
Ok, i see.
Now evaluating the lower limits my new limit is

lim(b→∞) (-b=1)/(e^b)+1
? What does this mean?

Your antiderivative turns out to be -xe-x - e-x, which you evaluate at b and at 0
(-b e^{-b} - e^{-b} ) - (-0e^{-0} - e^{-0})

\lim_{b \to \infty} (-b e^{-b} - e^{-b} ) - (-0e^{-0} - e^{-0}) = 1

The first two terms approach zero in the limit, so you're left with 1.

lcam2 said:
separating the limits and using l'hospital's, my new limits is 1
Is that correct?? Can i separate the limits?? I am not sure if i can do that.
Thanks for all the help
 
Mark44 said:
? What does this mean?

In particular, what is the = sign doing inside the brackets?
 
Mark44 said:
? What does this mean?

Your antiderivative turns out to be -xe-x - e-x, which you evaluate at b and at 0
(-b e^{-b} - e^{-b} ) - (-0e^{-0} - e^{-0})

\lim_{b \to \infty} (-b e^{-b} - e^{-b} ) - (-0e^{-0} - e^{-0}) = 1

The first two terms approach zero in the limit, so you're left with 1.

I'm confused with this term in the above expression:
<br /> -b e^{-b}<br />
when you plug in infinity for b...would you get -infinity * 0...which is undefined or an indeterminate form?
 
Last edited:
  • #10
rjs123 said:
I'm confused with this term in the above expression:
<br /> -b e^{-b}<br />
when you plug in infinity for b...would you get -infinity * 0...which is undefined or an indeterminate form?

Here's where we get the idea of growth and decay. e^(-b) decays to 0 much "faster" than b grows to infinity. I believe it's usually proven using L'Hopital's rule.
 
  • #11
CompuChip said:
In particular, what is the = sign doing inside the brackets?

I'm sorry, it was supposed to be (-b-1), there should not be = inside the brackets.
Thanks, your explanation really helped me!

Actually I have a question, can i write equations in Physics forums, it was very hard to write the equation, Does physics forums have an equation bar?? or something like that??
 
  • #12
There's LaTeX, but there isn't an equation bar. If you click Go Advanced, you get an extended menu bar with buttons for doing exponents (X2) and subscripts (X2). There's a \Sigma button that pops open a list of commonly used LaTeX tags.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K