Improving FM Radio Reception: Tips & Tricks

  • Thread starter Thread starter spender
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Fm Radio Tips
Click For Summary
To improve FM radio reception, users suggest various methods including attaching a longer wire to the existing antenna or using a small metallic object to enhance signal clarity. Adjusting the angle and length of the antenna can also help, as FM transmission antennas are typically elliptically polarized. For significant improvements, investing in a directional antenna like an 8-element YAGI mounted high is recommended, especially in remote areas. Building a 1/2 wavelength dipole antenna for the specific frequency of interest can yield better results than random wire lengths. Overall, experimenting with different antenna configurations and heights is key to achieving clearer FM reception.
spender
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
How to improve FM radio reception? I have this boombox type radio in my room with one meter long telescopic antenna, reception is sometimes really bad. Should I just hook up length of wire to the antenna or what ?
Thanks. :smile:
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
spender said:
How to improve FM radio reception? I have this boombox type radio in my room with one meter long telescopic antenna, reception is sometimes really bad. Should I just hook up length of wire to the antenna or what ?
Thanks. :smile:


well what i do normally...i have just a small antenna but i touch it to some very long metallic container in the open and it becomes clear..i would also love to know what is the processs to catch signals.. :blushing:
 
If I recall FM transmission antennas are elliptically polarized, with a dominant horizontal mode. You might try angling the receiving antenna and adjusting its length.
 
spender said:
How to improve FM radio reception? I have this boombox type radio in my room with one meter long telescopic antenna, reception is sometimes really bad. Should I just hook up length of wire to the antenna or what ?
Thanks. :smile:
What is feasible to do is dependant on circumstance but one solution would be to purchase a good directional antenna and mount it as high as possible. An 8-element YAGI would go a long way towards improving reception in remote/fringe areas. [digression] Imagine a 5-element nearly 60-feet off the ground using guy wired bamboo for the pole…that one worked well.[/digression]
FM is a peculiar beast however and sometimes the only thing that works well is to hold the antenna between finger and thumb, lol.
Ok, you did mention ‘boom box’ and a great many of these are made to be flashy at the expense of a good receiver. If you’re a hand with circuits you can build a booster for the front end and that may very well all you’ll need. One easy way to determine this is to bring in a receiver that is known to have good reception and compare the two. If yours is lacking, I’d break out the soldering iron and spare parts box.
Good luck.
 
thanks guys for the sugestionss, I just attached 4 meters of wire to the antenna and so far no major problems with reception.
 
I enjoyed Boulderhead's suggestion of the 5-8 element Yagi, guyed 60 feet off the ground :biggrin:
That would definitely make an improvement.

Something you could easily try and which ought to work better than a long random length of wire, is to make a 1/2\lambda dipole, cut for the center frequency of the FM band (or if you had a particular station you liked, you could cut the dipole for that frequency). I have used a 1/2 \lambda dipole for FM reception and suspend it horizontally and it works well.

Here is an example of what I am talking about.
http://members.tripod.com/martin_leese/Audio/indoor_aerial.html

Today most FM broadcast tranmissions are circularly polarlized, so if you are slightly more ambitious, you might build yourself a circularly polarized FM antenna.

see this example of what i am referring to:
http://www.n2.net/k6sti/attic.htm

(this antenna was made using 12 feet of #12 electrical wire and fed with 75\Omega coax).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am trying to understand how transferring electric from the powerplant to my house is more effective using high voltage. The suggested explanation that the current is equal to the power supply divided by the voltage, and hence higher voltage leads to lower current and as a result to a lower power loss on the conductives is very confusing me. I know that the current is determined by the voltage and the resistance, and not by a power capability - which defines a limit to the allowable...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
8K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
5K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K