Noise suppressor improves reception, why?

  • Thread starter Thread starter sasilverbulle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Noise
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the effects of installing a noise suppressor on a 1970 Lincoln AM/FM radio, specifically addressing the unexpected improvement in FM reception strength and clarity. Participants explore potential reasons for this phenomenon, including the impact of power supply noise on radio circuits and the role of Automatic Gain Control (AGC) in signal amplification.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • A participant notes that the noise suppressor reduced "whining" noise and improved FM station reception, prompting questions about the underlying reasons.
  • Another participant suggests that power supply noise can interfere with the device's circuits, affecting the output signal.
  • It is proposed that the Automatic Gain Control (AGC) circuit may increase the gain of input amplifiers when noise is reduced, allowing for better reception of weaker signals.
  • Some participants question whether FM actually utilizes AGC, arguing that FM's design allows for wide open gain to minimize AM-type noise.
  • One participant mentions that while FM may not have traditional AGC, a limiter is often used in FM receivers, which can function similarly by stabilizing the output against noise.
  • A reference to a WiFi-type receiver chip is provided to illustrate AGC feedback mechanisms, although its relevance to FM receivers is debated.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the presence and role of AGC in FM receivers, with some asserting its importance while others argue against it. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the exact mechanisms at play in the improved reception.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the lack of access to specific schematics for the radio, which may limit the depth of technical analysis. There is also uncertainty regarding the definitions and functions of AGC and limiters in the context of FM reception.

sasilverbulle
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Newbie here, not an EE, just an old Air Force electronic tech from the 70's...please be gentle. :)

I recently installed a noise suppressor inline to the 12v on my 70 Lincoln AM/FM radio. It cleaned up the "whining" noise just fine - but one interesting side note is that my FM stations come in a LOT stronger, not just clearer. Before I would loose my favorite FM station on the way to work in the same spots each time. After the noise suppressor I get the station strong the whole way.

This is creating a bit of a problem as the grey matter in my head can't seem to come to grips with why this could be. :confused:

The only thing I can think of is that the power is totally unfiltered in the radio and the "noise" on the line affected the tuning circuit. I don't have access to a schematic for this radio.

What do you'all think? Why do the stations come in much stronger now?

Thanks in advance!
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Someone can answer this better than I can, but the noise on your power supply can make its way into all the circuits of your device and interfere with the signal it is trying to output.

Power supply noise can be worse than noise in the actual signal, because usually filters are designed to remove the signal noise, but the noise they use to power them can make it to the output regardless of filters.

I'm sure there's lots of other reasons, but noise on power supplies is a problem not just for radio receivers.

P.S. Ya also you're right, the noise can get in the PLL or whatever tuning filter they're using and cause the tuning frequency to fluctuate with the noise
 
Last edited:
sasilverbulle said:
Newbie here, not an EE, just an old Air Force electronic tech from the 70's...please be gentle. :)

I recently installed a noise suppressor inline to the 12v on my 70 Lincoln AM/FM radio. It cleaned up the "whining" noise just fine - but one interesting side note is that my FM stations come in a LOT stronger, not just clearer. Before I would loose my favorite FM station on the way to work in the same spots each time. After the noise suppressor I get the station strong the whole way.

This is creating a bit of a problem as the grey matter in my head can't seem to come to grips with why this could be. :confused:

The only thing I can think of is that the power is totally unfiltered in the radio and the "noise" on the line affected the tuning circuit. I don't have access to a schematic for this radio.

What do you'all think? Why do the stations come in much stronger now?

Thanks in advance!

Welcome to the PF.

One big reason for the better "quiet line" performance is the Automatic Gain Control (AGC) circuit can now increase the gain of the input amplifiers more. That allows you to get better range and sound quality.

When there is noise in the circuit, the AGC will only increase the gain to the point where the noise is coming through strongly. Once the noise is reduced, the AGC will increase the input gain more to try to amplify weaker signals.
 
Does FM actually have AGC? I don't think so. A huge advantage of FM is to be able to run it wide open gain and limit it as to reduce AM type noise from lightning and etc.
 
Averagesupernova said:
Does FM actually have AGC? I don't think so. A huge advantage of FM is to be able to run it wide open gain and limit it as to reduce AM type noise from lightning and etc.

I think it would be pretty hard to have 70dB of dynamic range without AGC. You could probably do a simpler FM receiver with reduced dynamic range and some distortion of high RSSI signals, but I don't have any quantitavie numbers on a receiver like that.

Here's a typical WiFi-type receiver chip that shows the AGC feedback (block diagram on page 2):

http://www.analog.com/library/analogdialogue/archives/40-03/wireless_srd.pdf

.
 
In most FM receivers, a limiter is often applied after the IF stage which functions similarly to an AGC, and many designs have feedback loops to the IF stage, or the local oscillator in order to lock on the strongest frequency.
 
Thanks for the answers! That validated that I wasn't completely off-base on my deductions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
16
Views
8K
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
11K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
11K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
24K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K