Improving reception from a transmitter

  • Thread starter Thread starter benben26
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Transmitter
Click For Summary
Improving reception from a transmitter operating at 1GHz can be achieved through better antennas and low-noise amplifiers (LNA), rather than simply decreasing the transmission frequency. In specific environments like underwater, ultra-low frequencies (ULF) are necessary due to absorption by water, while higher frequencies face absorption challenges from atmospheric conditions. The effectiveness of a transmission system also depends on factors such as transmitter power, modulation type, distance to the receiver, and whether the receiver is stationary or mobile. Lower frequencies can cover longer distances but require larger antennas, making the choice of frequency a trade-off based on the application. Understanding these variables is crucial for optimizing the transmission link, especially in unique scenarios like tracking wildlife.
benben26
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



I need some points on how one would improve reception from a transmitter. The frequency of the transmission is originally 1GHz.


The Attempt at a Solution




Would deceasing the transmission frequency improve reception? Any other pointers?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This has not much to do with frequency. Better antenna, and LNA will improve reception considerably.

If you are in a submarine underwater, then you are constrained to use ULF frequencies (ultra low) because higher frequencies are absorbed by the water. Also at 23 GHz and 60 GHz there is a signal absorption from water vapor and oxygen in the air.
 
Tell us a little about your link. What have you tried so far? What kind of antennas does it use? How much power is your transmitter putting out? What kind of modulation are you using? How far away is your receiver? Do you know the sensitivity of your receiver?

Usually frequency is a given, not a variable. What is the purpose of your link?
 
Its a hypothetical question, a transmitter has been attatched to an elephant and it is being used to track the elephant.

Thanks for your help!
 
It's a trade off. Lower frequencies cover longer distances for the same power but require larger antennas. The optimum frequency would depend on factors such as the range, how long you expect the transmitter battery to last, what percentage of the time the transmitter is transmitting and so on. Is your receiver stationary or mobile? Often the mobile receiver uses a directional antenna to determine the direction of the transmitter.

I'm sure these devices already exist. You might investigate what frequency they use.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
650
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K