In integrating to find a volume when is the function included?

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the inclusion of a function in integrals when calculating volume, specifically contrasting double and triple integrals. Participants explore the conceptual framework behind these integrals and the reasoning for including or excluding the function.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification
  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about when to include the function in the integral for volume calculations, suggesting that it may only apply to double integrals.
  • Another participant agrees that in double integrals, the function is included to account for the height of the volume above the xy-plane, while in triple integrals, the function is not needed as all volume elements are treated equally.
  • A later reply reiterates the initial confusion and provides an algebraic equivalence to illustrate how the volume can be expressed as a double integral of the function.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree on the reasoning behind including the function in double integrals but there is some uncertainty regarding the treatment of functions in triple integrals, with differing interpretations present.

Contextual Notes

Some limitations in understanding may arise from the dependence on specific definitions of volume elements and the contexts in which these integrals are applied. The discussion does not resolve whether the function should be included in all cases of triple integrals.

Fractal20
Messages
71
Reaction score
1
I just want to clarify this. I have had trouble before with including the function in the integral when I am trying to find volume. I have come to think that this is necessarily only when it is a double integral. But I had a specific question I posted earlier and I feel like somebody told me that the function is never included.

More specifically, if I have z = f(x,y) and I want to integrate over some domain in the xy plane then I want to say the integral would look like [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] f(x,y) dx dy. Similarly, if it was in polar coords, f(r,theta) then I would have [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] f(r,theta)r dr d theta. I think this is true since the integral is "adding" little boxes of volume z dx dz or z r dr dtheta respectively.

However, if it is a triple integral, whether in spherical, cylindrical or Cartesian, the function is not included in the integral because dV is the little units of volume. Is this correct?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, this comes from the way one decides to construct the volume from buildling blocks, so to speak. Whne you find the volume as a double integral, you're dividing the xy plane into a bunch of tiny squares and then stacking squares up to a height based on the given function f. Obviously this is reasonable to find the volume beneath a surface.

When you're finding volume as a triple integral, you're constructing tiny cubes and, to find volume, you need only sum them up. There is no need for a weighting function like f. All cubes are created equal, so to speak.
 
Thanks for the verification!
 
Fractal20 said:
I just want to clarify this. I have had trouble before with including the function in the integral when I am trying to find volume. I have come to think that this is necessarily only when it is a double integral. But I had a specific question I posted earlier and I feel like somebody told me that the function is never included.

More specifically, if I have z = f(x,y) and I want to integrate over some domain in the xy plane then I want to say the integral would look like [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] f(x,y) dx dy. Similarly, if it was in polar coords, f(r,theta) then I would have [itex]\int[/itex][itex]\int[/itex] f(r,theta)r dr d theta. I think this is true since the integral is "adding" little boxes of volume z dx dz or z r dr dtheta respectively.

However, if it is a triple integral, whether in spherical, cylindrical or Cartesian, the function is not included in the integral because dV is the little units of volume. Is this correct?
Here's how to see the equivalence algebraically:
Volume = [itex]\int_V dv[/itex]
= [itex]\int \int \int_{z = 0}^{f(x,y)} dz dx dy[/itex]
= [itex]\int \int [z]_{z = 0}^{f(x,y)} dx dy[/itex]
= [itex]\int \int f(x,y) dx dy[/itex]
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K