High School In theory, could any element become unstable?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Trooper149
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Element Theory
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the concept of nuclear decay and the stability of particles. It questions whether any particle can become unstable due to energy imbalances within the nucleus, suggesting that external energy injections could theoretically induce instability. The conversation also explores the idea that while all isotopes may have varying degrees of stability, not all are inherently unstable. Stability is defined in terms of the ability to break apart without external energy, using the analogy of a boulder on a mountain to illustrate different stability configurations. Ultimately, the dialogue emphasizes the complexity of defining stability in nuclear physics.
Trooper149
Messages
14
Reaction score
3
Problem Statement: NA
Relevant Equations: NA

So just smashing through some info on particles and I have come across the term "decay" which seems to be used quite ambiguously.

Decay is the process where a nucleus expells radiation as a means to redress the imbalance of forces occurring within, as I understand it. Quite a few sources say "that decay is caused by the nucleus". This seems flawed, because if we were to treat the nucleus as a closed system, and there is an imbalance of energy between the outside and inside of the nucleus in the form of the 4 forces, then theoretically this imbalance can be caused by any injection of energy into the nucleus of the particle?

With this said, could you make any particle unstable?

Also would this make all isotopes unstable?

Appreciate any info.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Anything will break if we hit it hard enough with a big enough hammer, so in that sense everything is unstable. But because that’s an unhelpful way of defining stability, we instead consider a system to be unstable only if there’s a way for it to break apart without adding energy.

Thus, we consider a boulder at the foot of a mountain to be a stable configuration, but the same boulder on top of the mountain to be an unstable configuration: at any moment the boulder might roll downhill, releasing energy as it goes.

You are asking whether we should consider the situation with the boulder at the bottom just as unstable because we could add external energy by using a bulldozer to push the rock back uphill again.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Astronuc and Drakkith
A relative asked me about the following article: Experimental observation of a time rondeau crystal https://www.nature.com/articles/s41567-025-03028-y I pointed my relative to following article: Scientists Discovered a Time Crystal That Reveals a New Way to Order Time https://www.yahoo.com/news/articles/scientists-discovered-time-crystal-reveals-180055389.html This area is outside of my regular experience. I'm interested in radiation effects in polycrystalline material, i.e., grain...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
6K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
12K