Inclined Plane Static Friction Coefficient

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the static friction coefficient (μ) on an inclined plane equals tan(θ) using an x-axis parallel to the ground. The participant initially understands the proof with the incline as the x-axis but struggles with the trigonometric implications of a horizontal x-axis. Clarifications are provided regarding the need for a new free body diagram and the application of Newton's second law in both x and y directions. The importance of correctly identifying the components of forces, particularly the normal force and frictional force, is emphasized. Ultimately, the participant successfully resolves their confusion with assistance from others in the thread.
Mark Trice
Messages
7
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The static friction coefficient on an inclined plane is equal to tan(θ). The problem requires me to prove this also works by using an x-axis parallel to the ground rather than parallel to the incline. I understand how to get tan(θ) using the incline as the x-axis, but I don't know how to get tan(θ) using an x-axis parallel to the ground.

Homework Equations


μ = tan(θ)

The Attempt at a Solution


I worked out how to get tan(theta) using the incline as the x-axis by doing mgsin(θ) = (μ)(Normal Force) and mgcos(θ) = Normal Force and used algebraic manipulation to get μ = tan(θ), but I just can't wrap my head around how the trigonometry would work if I used a different x-axis.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Mark Trice and welcome to PF.

Will you please post the statement of the problem exactly as was given to you? Thanks.
 
The problem states "μ = tanθ is true no matter the axis you choose on an inclined plane. Prove this by making the x-axis parallel to the ground and solving for μ to get tanθ".
 
Mark Trice said:
The problem states "μ = tanθ is true no matter the axis you choose on an inclined plane. Prove this by making the x-axis parallel to the ground and solving for μ to get tanθ".
Solve what for μ? What is the physical situation? There must be more to this. In any case, it sounds like you have to draw a different free body diagram (?) with rotated axes relative to one you already have. How about starting from there? Please post your work in detail.

On edit: Imagine putting a small box on a plywood sheet. The coefficient friction between the two is, say, μ = 0.3. Now lift one end of the plywood so that it forms angle θ with the horizontal. If you increase the angle, tanθ will increase. If μ = tanθ, then μ should also increase to a value larger than 0.3 and keep on increasing as you increase the angle. Does this make sense to you?
 
Last edited:
Sorry for the confusing question; this question is based on a lab we did and I forgot to explain the situation of the lab. So basically in the lab we raised a piece of wood at an incline until a block on the inclined plane began to slide by overcoming the static friction. The angle θ is the angle that the incline makes with the ground. μ is the static friction coefficient on the inclined plane. So the question is dealing with a block that hasn't yet overcome the static friction, so it is sitting stationary on an inclined plane. I need to show that μ = tanθ is true of the block resting on the inclined plane by using an x-axis parallel to the ground (not an x-axis parallel to the incline!).

Let me know if I need to clear anything up.
 
Mark Trice said:
Sorry for the confusing question; this question is based on a lab we did and I forgot to explain the situation of the lab. So basically in the lab we raised a piece of wood at an incline until a block on the inclined plane began to slide by overcoming the static friction. The angle θ is the angle that the incline makes with the ground. μ is the static friction coefficient on the inclined plane. So the question is dealing with a block that hasn't yet overcome the static friction, so it is sitting stationary on an inclined plane. I need to show that μ = tanθ is true of the block resting on the inclined plane by using an x-axis parallel to the ground (not an x-axis parallel to the incline!).

Let me know if I need to clear anything up.
Thank you for providing the context. It is now clear what you have to do. Draw a free body diagram with the axes as required by the question. Note that the weight vector is entirely along the negative y-axis and the the force of friction and normal force, have x and y components. Write Newton's 2nd law twice, once for the new x-direction and once for the y-direction. Assume that the block is on the verge of slipping. It's a bit more complicated than the other coordinate system but doable if you are careful with your trig functions and your algebraic signs. If you think you need more help, please post your work. An uploaded photograph of your diagram might be sufficient if it's legible and has good contrast.
 
Here is my attempt at this so far. I can barely even start this because doing this without rotating the axis just doesn’t make sense to me. Should I put my x-axis through the center of the object parallel to the ground rather than on the ground?
 

Attachments

  • A951DEA5-72E5-40D6-B1A5-FD6C7BDEE60B.jpeg
    A951DEA5-72E5-40D6-B1A5-FD6C7BDEE60B.jpeg
    23.8 KB · Views: 337
Now I have a little bit more, but have no clue where to go now.
 

Attachments

  • B5C76471-B84F-4243-BB92-9AF6465394CD.jpeg
    B5C76471-B84F-4243-BB92-9AF6465394CD.jpeg
    17.4 KB · Views: 312
Mark Trice said:
Now I have a little bit more, but have no clue where to go now.
You have written that ##F_{sx}=\mu_{sx}F_{Nx}##.
First, ##\mu_{sx}## doesn't mean anything. μs is just a number. It cannot have x and y components.
Second, the frictional force depends on the normal force, not on just some component of the normal force.
You know that the frictional force has magnitude μsN. You know the direction of that force. What is its x component?
Third, you have written that the x component if the normal force is FNcosθ. Check that. Does it make sense when θ=0?
 
  • #10
(μs)cosθ for the x-component?

Oh crap, would it instead be Fnsinθ?

edit: Sorry, not sure how to do subscripts on here
 
  • #11
So I managed to figure it out surprisingly. Thank you all for the help.
 
  • #12
Mark Trice said:
not sure how to do subscripts on here
In the bar above the text entry area, look for X2; and X2 for superscript.
 
Back
Top