Increasing Compressor Efficiency Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the efficiency of compressors in refrigeration cycles, specifically exploring two proposed methods for improving efficiency: increasing suction pressure and reducing suction gas temperature. Participants express confusion over the interplay between these two methods and their implications for compressor performance.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that increasing suction pressure reduces the pressure drop across the compressor, thereby decreasing the work required.
  • Others argue that reducing suction gas temperature increases gas density, which also contributes to reduced work.
  • A participant questions the compatibility of both methods, suggesting that increasing pressure must also increase temperature, potentially negating the benefits of reduced temperature.
  • Another participant agrees that reducing suction gas temperature improves efficiency but raises concerns about the impact of reducing pressure drop on temperature differentials and overall efficiency.
  • Some participants highlight that the variables in the ideal gas law (Pv=nRT) do not remain constant throughout the cycle, complicating the analysis.
  • A later reply emphasizes that pressure, volume, and temperature are interdependent and vary throughout the system, suggesting that a holistic view is necessary to understand gas behavior in the compressor.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between increasing suction pressure and reducing suction gas temperature, with no consensus reached on whether one method is superior or if a balance is necessary. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of these methods on compressor efficiency.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that assumptions about constant variables in the closed cycle may not hold true, and the complexity of gas behavior in varying conditions is acknowledged. There is also mention of the need for additional equations to resolve the relationships between pressure, volume, and temperature.

cskib21
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
I reference this forum all the time and you guys are always good at breaking down confusing questions so I decided I needed to make an account and get some help with a mental struggle I have been having for quite some time!

Two commonly discussed ways of improving a compressor's efficiency in a standard refrigeration cycle are:

1) Increase suction pressure- Less dp across compressor, less work.
2) Reduce suction gas temperature- Denser gas, less work.

This is confusing to me and I am hoping someone can clarify. My thoughts:
1) When the pressure is increased, the temperature must also increase as well, right? Pv=nRT.
2) And when the temperature of the gas is decreased, the pressure must also decrease as well right?
-assuming v,n and R stay constant in the closed cycle...

So how can both of these measures be true? You are negatively effecting one by improving the other so can't only one of these be correct? Or is it a balance of both?

I can't wrap my head around it, any help is appreciated.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
I'm no expert on refrigeration cycle, but I agree with a reduction on suction gas temperature increasing efficiency since COP = 1 / (TH / TL - 1).

For the other one, sure, reducing the pressure drop across the pump will reduce the pump work, but it will also reduce the temperature differential, thus the efficiency. That would be amazing if one could reduce the pressure drop to zero while maintaining the same heat transfer!
 
cskib21 said:
I reference this forum all the time and you guys are always good at breaking down confusing questions so I decided I needed to make an account and get some help with a mental struggle I have been having for quite some time!

Two commonly discussed ways of improving a compressor's efficiency in a standard refrigeration cycle are:

1) Increase suction pressure- Less dp across compressor, less work.
2) Reduce suction gas temperature- Denser gas, less work.

This is confusing to me and I am hoping someone can clarify. My thoughts:
1) When the pressure is increased, the temperature must also increase as well, right? Pv=nRT.
2) And when the temperature of the gas is decreased, the pressure must also decrease as well right?
-assuming v,n and R stay constant in the closed cycle...

So how can both of these measures be true? You are negatively effecting one by improving the other so can't only one of these be correct? Or is it a balance of both?

I can't wrap my head around it, any help is appreciated.
You're right, but there are other variables in that equation you can change...
 
Won't v,n and R stay constant in the closed cycle...?
 
cskib21 said:
Won't v,n and R stay constant in the closed cycle...?
Why be closed?

Or, rather, why make a different cycle, with some parameters different, but not others?
 
cskib21 said:
Won't v,n and R stay constant in the closed cycle...?
n will not necessarily be constant.

If you used the form p = ρRT for the equation, and you know either p, ρ or T, then you are stuck with one equation and two unknowns. You are missing an equation to find a unique solution. For gases, you use pvk = constant (polytropic process assumption) and when phase changes are involved, thermodynamic properties tables are used.
 
cskib21, you need to think about how a chunk (a given mass) of the gas changes as it travels through the system. You can't meaningfully use Pv=nRT on the whole system at once, because pressure, volume, and temperature vary from location to location. To increase the density (m/v) of the gas before it enters the compressor, you can run it through a heat exchanger. Its volume will decrease, ignoring any pressure change, per Pv=nRT, assuming it acts like an ideal gas.
So the main point is that P, v, and T of the chunk of mass are all variables, dependent on each other.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
8K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K