Increasing motor efficiency to reduce energy consumption?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on advancements in motor efficiency technologies, highlighting companies like Turntide Technologies and EXRO Technologies. Turntide is developing a software-driven motor aimed at optimizing energy use, while EXRO's Coil Driver enhances electric motor capabilities by enabling dual torque profiles. Participants express skepticism about the potential impact of these innovations, noting that electric motors are already highly efficient, with significant improvements being challenging. Concerns are raised regarding the marketing of old technologies, particularly Turntide's switched reluctance motor, which has historical roots dating back to the 19th century. Overall, while there may be some benefits for specific applications, detailed case studies and practical availability remain critical for assessing their true impact.
TorqueJones
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
Motor controls and coil drivers that increase efficiency. Revolutionary ideas or old ideas dressed up with marketing?
I was looking into companies or startups that were doing things with motors to improve efficiency. I stumbled upon Turntide Technologies, which has a partnership with Amazon. Turntide is making a software-driven motor that "enables precise and reliable control to effectively use every watt of energy to reduce electricity consumption and achieve optimal efficiency." https://turntide.com/technology/

Then I stumbled upon, EXRO Technologies. "Exro's advanced motor control technology, the "Coil Driver", expands the capabilities of electric motors and powertrains. The Coil Driver enables two separate torque profiles within a given motor. The first is calibrated for low speed and high torque, while the second provides expanded operation at high speed." https://www.exro.com/technology/coil-driver

Do you all think this technology has a chance to really have a big impact or are these old ideas with a little bit of marketing added to them? Thanks for any thoughts you can share.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Electric motors are typically 90% efficient or better, so I don't think there is a whole lot to be gained. However if you have a lot of motors, or have very high power motors, then every little bit helps. We would need more details to judge.
 
  • Like
Likes russ_watters and berkeman
Integral horsepower induction motors are subject to efficiency standards, and that efficiency is a function of motor size. Good search term to learn more is induction motor efficiency standards. This chart is from one of the hits: https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2014/04/f15/amo_motors_handbook_web.pdf.
Motor Efficiency.jpg

These motors are already efficient enough that huge increases are just not possible. Smaller motors have more room for improvement. ECM motors (search the term) have been commonly available for about 30 years. They are popular in HVAC systems for both pumps and blower motors. This pump in my home heating system varies its speed depending on whether one, two, or all three zones are running. The photo was taken with two zones running:
Pump.jpg


Turntide has a new spin on 30 year old technology. Their design is a switched reluctance motor, Switched reluctance is an old design that became practical with the development of modern electronics. It competes with the permanent magnet rotor motor design in the pump shown above, and it competes with vector drive induction motors.
 
  • Like
  • Informative
Likes Master1022, russ_watters, 256bits and 2 others
jrmichler said:
Integral horsepower induction motors are subject to efficiency standards
Definitely a noticeable 'scale up' in efficiency wrt Hp of the motor.
 
TorqueJones said:
Do you all think this technology has a chance to really have a big impact or are these old ideas with a little bit of marketing added to them?
There is still a lot of old 'crappy' motors being used in peoples homes.
But this isn't for that I would suspect.
 
TorqueJones said:
Summary:: Motor controls and coil drivers that increase efficiency. Revolutionary ideas or old ideas dressed up with marketing?

I was looking into companies or startups that were doing things with motors to improve efficiency. I stumbled upon Turntide Technologies, which has a partnership with Amazon. Turntide is making a software-driven motor that "enables precise and reliable control to effectively use every watt of energy to reduce electricity consumption and achieve optimal efficiency." https://turntide.com/technology/
...

Do you all think this technology has a chance to really have a big impact or are these old ideas with a little bit of marketing added to them? Thanks for any thoughts you can share.
I only looked at the first. It's a "switched reluctance motor", which wikipedia tells me was first patented in 1838 (!). So it's a really, really old idea. It's been refined of course.

For small motors running at low RPM, efficiencies drop substantially and this type of motor may help avoid that. How much of a benefit? It's tough to know: Yes, there is a lot of marketing hype in there and no detailed case studies.

More concerning is that I don't see a way to buy one, and I see the company's name changed last year (from "Software Motor Company"). It looks like a startup that isn't actually off the ground yet. The cynic in me thinks they originally picked "Software Motor Company" because they thought it would make venture capitalists backsides tingle and they are hoping to market it by putting internet into it.
 
Thread 'What type of toilet do I have?'
I was enrolled in an online plumbing course at Stratford University. My plumbing textbook lists four types of residential toilets: 1# upflush toilets 2# pressure assisted toilets 3# gravity-fed, rim jet toilets and 4# gravity-fed, siphon-jet toilets. I know my toilet is not an upflush toilet because my toilet is not below the sewage line, and my toilet does not have a grinder and a pump next to it to propel waste upwards. I am about 99% sure that my toilet is not a pressure assisted...
After over 25 years of engineering, designing and analyzing bolted joints, I just learned this little fact. According to ASME B1.2, Gages and Gaging for Unified Inch Screw Threads: "The no-go gage should not pass over more than three complete turns when inserted into the internal thread of the product. " 3 turns seems like way to much. I have some really critical nuts that are of standard geometry (5/8"-11 UNC 3B) and have about 4.5 threads when you account for the chamfers on either...
Thread 'Physics of Stretch: What pressure does a band apply on a cylinder?'
Scenario 1 (figure 1) A continuous loop of elastic material is stretched around two metal bars. The top bar is attached to a load cell that reads force. The lower bar can be moved downwards to stretch the elastic material. The lower bar is moved downwards until the two bars are 1190mm apart, stretching the elastic material. The bars are 5mm thick, so the total internal loop length is 1200mm (1190mm + 5mm + 5mm). At this level of stretch, the load cell reads 45N tensile force. Key numbers...
Back
Top