MHB Indefinite integral with two parts

find_the_fun
Messages
147
Reaction score
0
I'm trying to integrate [math]\int e^{4\ln{x}}x^2 dx[/math]
I can't see using u-substition, [math]x^2[/math] isn't the derivative of [math]e^{4\ln{x}}[/math] nor vice-versa.

I tried integrating by parts and that didn't work. I used [math]u=e^{4\ln{x}}[/math] and [math]dv=x^2 dx[/math]

I know I can't rewrite [math]e^{4\ln{x}}[/math] as [math]e^4e^\ln{x}[/math]
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Re: indefinite integral with two parts

find_the_fun said:
I'm trying to integrate [math]\int e^{4\ln{x}}x^2 dx[/math]
I can't see using u-substition, [math]x^2[/math] isn't the derivative of [math]e^{4\ln{x}}[/math] nor vice-versa.

I tried integrating by parts and that didn't work. I used [math]u=e^{4\ln{x}}[/math] and [math]dv=x^2 dx[/math]

Note that $e^{4\ln x} = e^{\ln(x^4)} = x^4$.

Can you take things from here?
 
Re: indefinite integral with two parts

Chris L T521 said:
Note that $e^{4\ln x} = e^{\ln(x^4)} = x^4$.

Can you take things from here?

I guess the lesson learned from this is to simplify the expression algebraically before attempting integration techniques.
 
For original Zeta function, ζ(s)=1+1/2^s+1/3^s+1/4^s+... =1+e^(-slog2)+e^(-slog3)+e^(-slog4)+... , Re(s)>1 Riemann extended the Zeta function to the region where s≠1 using analytical extension. New Zeta function is in the form of contour integration, which appears simple but is actually more inconvenient to analyze than the original Zeta function. The original Zeta function already contains all the information about the distribution of prime numbers. So we only handle with original Zeta...
Back
Top