Indefinite Integrals: How Were They Figured Out?

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter jdavel
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indefinite Integrals
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the methods and thought processes involved in deriving indefinite integrals, particularly how they are figured out and whether they can be systematically approached using standard techniques like substitution and integration by parts. The conversation also touches on the nature of certain integrals that may not have elementary anti-derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions whether all indefinite integrals can be derived using standard methods or if they require more exploratory approaches.
  • Another participant asserts that while many integrals can be solved using integration methods, some may require tricks or may not have elementary anti-derivatives, leading to the definition of new functions.
  • A specific integral, Int(dx/cosx), is discussed, with various methods proposed for its solution, including multiplying the integrand by sec x and using partial fractions.
  • A participant inquires about the insights or thought processes that lead to the discovery of certain integration techniques, suggesting that experience plays a significant role in recognizing potential methods.
  • It is noted that with experience, one may develop an intuition for seeing the connections between different mathematical concepts that facilitate integration.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the methods for solving indefinite integrals, with some advocating for standard techniques while others emphasize the role of experience and experimentation. The discussion does not reach a consensus on a singular approach to integration.

Contextual Notes

Participants acknowledge the limitations of standard methods and the potential need for creative problem-solving in integration, highlighting that some integrals may not have straightforward solutions.

Who May Find This Useful

This discussion may be of interest to students learning integration techniques, educators seeking to understand different teaching approaches, and mathematicians exploring the foundations of integral calculus.

jdavel
Messages
617
Reaction score
1
I've been wondering how all those indefinite integrals in a comprehensive table were figured out. Can they all be done with one (or some combination) of the standard methods, (substitution, parts etc.)? Or did somebody just poke around until they figured them out? For example, how do you find that Int(dx/cosx) = ln(1/cosx + tanx)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
All the indefinite integrals is tables can either be done by some integration method, and not just differentiating a lot of functions to see if they give what they want. Its not always a standard method though, some tricks are sometimes required. Other times, there actually is no elementary anti-derivative and they instead define that integral to be another function.

For your specific integral, There are a few ways of doing it.

A common way is (writing 1/cos x as sec x) multiplying the integrand through by (sec x + tan x). However, that makes it seem like you've already done this before and hence you know you can rely of this otherwise remarkable step.

So the way I prefer to do it as many people might see more easily, though it takes some more work. Multiply the integrand through by cos x, use the pythagorean identity on the denominator, a simple substitution and partial fractions, were home free =]
 
Gib Z,

Very nice!

Let me ask you something. If you were teaching integration, how would you explain to your students what went through your head to come up with the idea of multiplying the integrand by cos(x)/cos(x)? Is there an insight that could be used when they hit another integral that doesn't seem to have an obvious method of solution? Did you see all at once the whole "...cos squared of x in the denominaor is going to give me a function of sin(x) through the Pythagorean theorem, and the differential for that will have cos(x) in it, which is just what I'll need for the cos(x)dx that I've created in the numerator..." ?
 
Its all about experience and experimenting. Even with all the standard methods of integration, there's always certain things you pick you from your own experience about what will work and what won't. Eventually you get to a point where..well yes, you do see the whole quote straight away.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K