Indented contour integration + applying jordans lemma

  • Thread starter Thread starter MM360
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Integration
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the application of Jordan's lemma in the context of contour integration, specifically for the integral of \([cos(x) - 1]/(x^2)\). The user successfully applies the residue theorem to evaluate the integral of \([exp(-iz) - 1]/(2z^2)\), yielding a result of \(\pi\). The key challenge addressed is the reasoning behind the first integral approaching zero, which is resolved through the use of Taylor expansion and contour indentation to manage the singularity at \(z = 0\). The importance of contour indentation in complex analysis is emphasized, particularly in handling singularities on the contour.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of complex analysis concepts, particularly contour integration
  • Familiarity with Jordan's lemma and its applications
  • Knowledge of the residue theorem and how to compute residues
  • Ability to work with Taylor series expansions in complex functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Jordan's lemma in various contour integration problems
  • Learn how to compute residues using the residue theorem in complex analysis
  • Explore Taylor series expansions for complex functions and their implications
  • Review examples of contour integrals with singularities to understand indentation techniques
USEFUL FOR

Students of complex analysis, mathematicians dealing with contour integration, and anyone preparing for exams involving advanced calculus concepts.

MM360
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hi I am new on here so I am just writing out the question.

Real integral ie from - infinity to + infinity of [cos(x) -1]/(x^2)

2. Homework Equations + solution attempt
I know you have to use the exp cosx idenity and then split the integral.
also it has a removable singularity at z =0 and also the contour has to be indented
I have the ans for this question but my main problem is how this happens

integral of [exp(iz) - 1]/2(z^2) = 0

but the integral of

[exp(-iz)-1]/2(z^2) = pi ( once residue thoerm is applied)

Also could anyone please explain how to apply Jordans lemma to these kind of questions

I have exams soon so any help would be much appreciated :smile:
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't know this for you is useful or not?

Try using this formula to match it.

Res(f,a)=1/(m-1)!lim(z→a)〖d(m-1)/〖dz〗(m-1) 〗 [(z-a)mf(z)]

m is the pole of the order;a is pole.

After that, give your answer as:

integral of f(z)=2(pi)i(∑n(j=1)〖Res(f;zj)〗)
 
Last edited:
thanks for the reply - but I am fine with calculating the residue - its the reasoning of why the first integral i mentioned goes to 0

its easier to expand the top in its Taylor expansion and divide to get a residue of i/2pi - this is not a problem only the reasoning
 
I used cosx = 1/2[exp(ix) + exp(-ix)]

x and z are just dummy variables so that is correct - even the solution has the same thing

its just the indenting contour reasoning I am stuck on
 
If not going wrong:

:redface: no ! the first integral where got 0 ?:smile:

Are you trouble at e0 is equal to 1 .:-p

If not, i am sorry about that because this sem my exam also going with this topic.:shy:
 
Last edited:
By the triangle inequality we have
\left|\frac{exp(iz) - 1}{2z^2}\right | \leq \frac{1}{|z|^2}
whence the conclusion follows by a simple estimate on the first integral.
 
The idea in that the singularity is on the contour, and so to counter that you make a small indentation in the form of a semi-circle of radius \varepsilon so that the singularity is outside the contour. You just examine what this gives, it looks to be quite an easy calculation in your case.

This sort of problem has popped up in my research, which is why I know about it. Complex analysis is very useful for waves.
 
Thanks everyone for the help/replies

I have found the reason why and my lecturer has confirmed it

so i understand it now
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K