Independence of Trace-Partition function

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter George444fg
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Independence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the calculation of the partition function for two completely decoupled systems in statistical mechanics. The participant confirms that the probability density function (PDF) of the total system is indeed the product of the PDFs of each subsystem, leading to the conclusion that the total partition function can be expressed as the product of the individual partition functions: Z_{sk}(T) = Z_s(T) * Z_k(T). This is validated through the Gibbs distribution and the use of Hamiltonians for each subsystem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of statistical mechanics concepts, particularly partition functions.
  • Familiarity with Hamiltonian mechanics and its notation.
  • Knowledge of the Gibbs distribution and its application in thermodynamics.
  • Basic understanding of probability density functions (PDFs) in the context of independent systems.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Gibbs distribution and its implications for partition functions.
  • Explore Hamiltonian mechanics in greater detail, focusing on its role in statistical mechanics.
  • Learn about the implications of decoupled systems in statistical ensembles.
  • Investigate advanced topics in statistical mechanics, such as the canonical ensemble and its applications.
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in the field of statistical mechanics, particularly those interested in partition functions and the behavior of decoupled systems.

George444fg
Messages
25
Reaction score
4
TL;DR
Partition Function of a separable hamiltonian
I am trying to calculate the partition function of the system of two completely decoupled systems. Probability-wise, the decoupled nature means that the PDF is the product of the PDF of each subsystem. I just wanted to be sure that it would translate into:

$$
H = \sum_{k_i, s_i}e^{H_s(s_i)}e^{H_k(k_i)} = \sum_{k_i}(\sum_{s_i}e^{H_s(s_i)})e^{H_k(k_i)} = \sum_{s_i}e^{H_s(s_i)}\sum_{k_i}e^{H_k(k_i)} = Tr(e^{H_s(s_i)})*Tr(e^{H_k(k_i)})
$$

I know the question seems trivial, but I got a bit confused, and I would like to be 100% sure. Thank you for any help you can provide
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Science news on Phys.org
Your notation seems rather awkward (the "##H##" on the left-hand-side of your formula has nothing to do with the "##H##'s" in the exponents), but essentially yes - your expression is correct.

You can also see that you're right by considering, e.g., the Gibbs distribution for the subsystem ##n## (with the Hamiltonian ##H_n##) at the given temperature ##T## (##k_B## below is the Boltzmann constant):
$$ p_n(T) = \frac{e^{-H_n/k_B T}}{Z_n(T)} \rm{,}$$
where ##Z_n(T)## is the partition function for this subsystem,
$$ Z_n(T) = \text{Tr}\{e^{-H_n/k_B T}\} \rm{.}$$
Now, if you have two statistically independent subsystems ##s## and ##k##, the probability density of the total system ##s+k## is a product, as you've already noted:
$$p_{sk}(T) = p_s(T) \cdot p_k(T) \rm{.}$$
From this you immediately obtain that the partition function for the total ##s+k## system is ##Z_{sk}(T) = Z_s(T) \cdot Z_k(T)## - which is the result you got at the rightmost hand-side of your formula.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K