Graduate Index Juggling: Angular Momentum Tensor & Inertia Tensor in 3D-Space

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on the relationship between the angular momentum tensor and the inertia tensor in 3D space. It begins with the definition of the angular momentum tensor and its relation to rotational velocity, leading to a derived form of the inertia tensor. The conversation highlights the need to understand how to transition from a four-index inertia tensor to the common three-index form used in 3D, emphasizing the importance of index contraction. Participants discuss the Levi-Civita tensor properties and their implications for deriving the inertia tensor. The conclusion underscores that in 3D, upper and lower indices are equivalent, simplifying the relationship between the tensors.
sergiokapone
Messages
306
Reaction score
17
Lets consider the angular momentum tensor (here ##m=1##)
\begin{equation}
L^{ij} = x^iv^j - x^jv^i
\end{equation}
and rortational velocity of particle (expressed via angular momentum tensor)
\begin{equation}
v^j = \omega^{jm}x_m.
\end{equation}

Then

\begin{equation}
L^{ij} = x^ix_m\omega^{jm} - x^jx_m\omega^{im}
\end{equation}

Now we can lower indices near ##\omega## with metric tensor:
\begin{align}
\omega^{jm} = g^{jn}g^{mr}\omega_{nr} \\
\omega^{im} = g^{in}g^{mr}\omega_{nr}
\end{align}

So, we get

\begin{equation}
L^{ij} = \left( x^ix_mg^{jn}g^{mr} - x^jx_m g^{in}g^{mr}\right) \omega_{nr}
\end{equation}

So, we can conclude ##L^{ij} = I^{ijnr} \omega_{nr}##, the inertia tensor is

\begin{equation}
I^{ijnr} = x^ix_mg^{jn}g^{mr} - x^jx_m g^{in}g^{mr}
\end{equation}Common form of inertia tensor
\begin{equation}
I^i_j = \delta_j^i x^2 - x^ix_j
\end{equation}

So, my question, how can I get common form of inertia tensor ##I^i_j ## in case 3D-space based on my ##I^{ijnr} ## (if it correct, of course)?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What's the relation between L, I and omega for your "common form of I"? The indices don't match between that common form and your I with 4 indices.

Also, be aware of solving for tensors in contractions if these contractions involve (anti)symmetric tensors.
 
haushofer said:
What's the relation between L, I and omega for your "common form of I"? The indices don't match between that common form and your I with 4 indices.

Definition of angular momentum vector (##m = 1##)
\begin{equation}
L_l = \epsilon_{lij}x^iv^j
\end{equation}
(##L_l## dual to ##L^{ij} = x^iv^j - x^jv^i## tensor)

Rortational velocity of particle
\begin{equation}
v^j = \epsilon^{jrk}\omega_rx_k.
\end{equation}
(##\omega_r## dual to ##\omega^{jk}## antisymmetric tensor of angular velocity ##\epsilon^{jrk}\omega_r = \omega^{jk}##)

Substitute in the angular momentum definition
\begin{equation}
L_l = \epsilon_{lij}x^i\epsilon^{jrk}\omega_rx_k.
\end{equation}

Let us use the property of the Levi-Civita tensor:
\begin{equation}
\epsilon^{lij} = -\epsilon^{jli}
\end{equation}

then

\begin{equation}
L_l = - \epsilon_{jli}\epsilon^{jkr}x^ix_k\omega_r.
\end{equation}

Let us use another property of the Levi-Civita tensor:
\begin{equation}
\epsilon_{jli}\epsilon^{jkr} = \delta_l^k\delta_i^r - \delta_l^r\delta_i^k.
\end{equation}

\begin{equation}
L_l = \left( \delta_l^r\delta_i^k - \delta_l^k\delta_i^r \right) x^ix_k\omega_r.
\end{equation}

Expand the brackets and take into account that ##\delta_i^r x^i = x^r##, ##\delta_l^k x_k = x_l## and ##\delta_i^k x^i = x^k##, we get
\begin{equation}
L_l = \left( \delta_l^r x^kx_k - x^rx_l\right) \omega_r,
\end{equation}

or

\begin{equation}
L_l = \left( \delta_l^r x^2 - x^rx_l\right) \omega_r,
\end{equation}

where inertia tensor
\begin{equation}
I_l^r = \delta_l^r x^2 - x^rx_l
\end{equation}
 
sergiokapone said:
\begin{equation}
I^{ijnr} = x^ix_mg^{jn}g^{mr} - x^jx_m g^{in}g^{mr}
\end{equation}

Common form of inertia tensor
\begin{equation}
I^i_j = \delta_j^i x^2 - x^ix_j
\end{equation}

So, my question, how can I get common form of inertia tensor ##I^i_j ## in case 3D-space based on my ##I^{ijnr} ## (if it correct, of course)?
In 3D there is no difference between upper and lower indices, and the metric is: g_{ij} = g^{ij} = \delta^{ij} = \delta_{ij} = \delta^{i}_{j}. But even if you keep using upper and lower indices, "your tensor" is just I^{ijmn} = x^{i}x^{j} g^{mn} - x^{m}x^{j}g^{in}. To obtain the inertia tensor from that, you just need to contract with g_{ij}: g_{ij}I^{ijmn} = x^{2}g^{mn} – x^{m}x^{n} , or g_{ln}g_{ij}I^{ijmn} \equiv I^{jm}_{j}{}_{l} = x^{2} \delta^{m}{}_{l} - x^{m}x_{l} .
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes sergiokapone
MOVING CLOCKS In this section, we show that clocks moving at high speeds run slowly. We construct a clock, called a light clock, using a stick of proper lenght ##L_0##, and two mirrors. The two mirrors face each other, and a pulse of light bounces back and forth betweem them. Each time the light pulse strikes one of the mirrors, say the lower mirror, the clock is said to tick. Between successive ticks the light pulse travels a distance ##2L_0## in the proper reference of frame of the clock...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
843
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
738
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K