The Inertia Tensor .... Determining Components of Angular Momentum ....

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
4 replies · 3K views
Math Amateur
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
3,920
Reaction score
48
TL;DR
I am having trouble following Neuenschwander's logic in deriving the components of angular momentum ... as he proceed to derive the components of the inertia tensor
I am reading Tensor Calculus for Physics by Dwight E. Neuenschwander and am having difficulties in following his logic regarding proceeding to derive the components of Angular Momentum and from there the components of the Inertia Tensor ...

On page 36 we read the following:
Neuenschwander ... Section 2,2 page 36.png


In the above text by Neuenschwander we read the following:

" ... ... ## L = \int [ ( r \bullet r ) \omega - r ( r \bullet \omega ) ] dm ## ... ... ... (2.9)

Relative to an xyz coordinate system and noting that

## \omega^i = \sum_j \omega^j \delta^{ij} ## ... ... ... (2.10)

the ith component of L may be written

## L^i =\sum_j \omega^j \ \int [ \delta^{ij} ( r \bullet r ) - x^i x^j] dm ## ... ... ... (2.11) ... ... ... "Can some please (... preferably in some detail) show me how Neuenschwander derives the expression for ## L^i ### (that is equation 2.11 from the equations above 2.11 ...Help will be much appreciated ...
Now I think it will be helpful for readers of the above post to have access to the start of Section 2.2 so i am providing this ... as follows:

Neuenschwander ... section 2.2 Page 34 .png


Neuenschwander ... Section 2,2 Page 35.png


'
Hope that helps

Peter
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the reply Orodruin ... Given that it should be straight forward i had another shot at demonstrating the Neuenschwander Equation 2.9 leads to (the compact and rather non-intuitive IMO) equation 2.11 ... I think my demonstration is OK ... but not completely sure ... details follow ...

Peter
... 2.11 follows from 2.9 ... Page 1.png
... 2.11 follows from 2.9 ... Page  2 .png
... 2.11 follows from 2.9 ... Page  3 ... .png
Hope that is OK ...

Peter
 
You are way overcomplicating things by writing out all the terms explicitly. The ith component of any vector ##\vec v## is given by ##v_i = \vec e_i \cdot \vec v## and therefore
$$
L_i = \vec e_i\cdot \vec L
= \int [r^2 \vec e_i\cdot\vec\omega - (\vec e_i\cdot \vec x)(\vec x\cdot \vec \omega)] dm
= \int [r^2 \omega_i - x_i (\vec x\cdot \vec \omega)] dm.
$$
Now use that ##\omega_i = \delta_{ij}\omega_j## and ##\vec x \cdot \vec \omega = x_j \omega_j## (implicit sums over j due to the summation convention) and you obtain
$$
L_i
= \int [r^2 \delta_{ij}- x_i x_j]\omega_j dm
$$
where ##\omega_j## is constant and can be moved out of the integral.
 
Last edited:
Reply
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Math Amateur
Thanks Orodruin … most helpful …

Appreciate your help …

Peter