Index Notation for Rank-2 Tensor with Summation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the representation of a rank-2 tensor using index notation, specifically focusing on the transformation from a divergence operation to partial derivatives and the implications of index usage in the notation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the reasoning behind the use of the same index for different components in the tensor notation. Questions arise regarding the validity of the transformation and the specific indexing conventions used in the context of tensor representation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing examination of the index notation and its implications, with some participants questioning the generality of the transformation presented in the original post. Clarifications about the rank of the tensor and the specific indices being used are also noted.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of using specific indices in the context of tensor notation, particularly in relation to the dimensionality of the tensor and the axes represented by the indices.

Niles
Messages
1,834
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have the following rank-2 tensor
<br /> T = \nabla \cdot \sum_{i}{c_ic_ic_i}<br />
I would like to write this using index notation. According to my book it becomes
<br /> T_{ab} = \partial_y \sum_{i}{c_{ia}c_{ib}c_{iy}} <br />
Question: The change \nabla \rightarrow \partial_y and c_i \rightarrow c_{ia} I agree with. However, it is not clear to me why my book uses the same index y for \partial_y as it does for c_{iy}. Why are we allowed to do that?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The indices, which in 3 dimensions would be "1", "2", and "3", typically correspond components in the direction of the "x", y", and "z" axes. Apparently your book is allowing "i", "a", and "b" to mean any of the directions but the "y" refers specifically to the direction of the y axis.
 
But is it true that

<br /> \nabla \cdot \sum_{i}{c_ic_ic_i} \leftrightarrow \partial_y \sum_{i}{c_{ia}c_{ib}c_{iy}} <br />

in general? IMO the last c_{iy} should be a c_{iq}, i.e. some index different from y.
 
Note that it is a rank-2 tensor, not a 3D tensor as I originally wrote
 
I get it now... thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
810
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K