Index of a critical point in a vecor field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on calculating the index of a critical point in a vector field, specifically from Henle's "Combinatorial Introduction to Topology." The initial calculation used the formula index = 1 + (e - h)/2, resulting in an incorrect index of 0 due to miscounting elliptic and hyperbolic sectors. The correct index is -2, confirmed by analyzing the direction of the vector field at critical points X and Y, which exhibit a clockwise turn. The importance of following the complete circle to compute the winding number is emphasized, revealing that the winding number is zero.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector fields and critical points
  • Familiarity with elliptic and hyperbolic sectors in topology
  • Knowledge of the winding number concept
  • Experience with phase portraits and their analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the calculation of indices in vector fields using the index theorem
  • Learn about the properties of elliptic and hyperbolic sectors in dynamical systems
  • Explore the concept of winding numbers in more depth
  • Investigate the implications of phase portraits in topology and dynamical systems
USEFUL FOR

Students of topology, mathematicians analyzing vector fields, and anyone interested in the application of the index theorem in dynamical systems.

logarithmic
Messages
103
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


This is from Henle's Combinatorial Introduction to Topology, section 9 question 2d).

Here's the phase portrait: http://img69.imageshack.us/img69/70/phasepor.jpg

Find the index of the point in the center of that picture.

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the fact that index = 1 + (e - h)/2, where e = number of elliptic sectors, and h = number of hyperbolic sectors.

In the picture, only D is elliptic, so e = 1, and B, E, F are hyperbolic, so h = 3, which gives index = 0. (A and C are parabolic sectors and don't count for the purposes of finding the index.)

The correct answer is -2. Which can be confirmed by noting that if we pick "pointing upwards" as a reference direction, only at X and Y does it point upwards, and at both these places there is a clockwise turn (a turn in the negative direction), so index = -2.

What's wrong with the first method?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
logarithmic said:
The correct answer is -2. Which can be confirmed by noting that if we pick "pointing upwards" as a reference direction, only at X and Y does it point upwards, and at both these places there is a clockwise turn (a turn in the negative direction), so index = -2.

Are you trying to compute the winding number here? You can't just pick two points on a circle around the critical point and note the direction that the vector is turning to do that. You need to follow the complete circle and keep track of the total angle swept out by the vector field. If you do this for your diagram, you'll find that that the winding number is zero. For example, if you follow the curve from X to Y, you'll find that the angle swept is 0, not [tex]2\pi[/tex].
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
539
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
9K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
21
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Poll Poll
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K